http://pcpartpicker.com/p/M2rqCJ
Cause you said $4,000.

This post was edited by Upset on Dec 12 2015 05:23pm

Lol

lol

Only fucktards can think amd can compete with Intel right now

But you can hope for zen

If it gets released I hope it does makes Intel vs and more interesting

Prices change daily if not hourly during the silly season. Best to post 1-2 days before you are ready to buy.

intel build finally.. ( sorry 6 month old son needed my attention more than a build )..

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ckxTGX

pricing may be comparable to my previous amd build, but incompatabilities with intel is rediculous, worked with what i could/what was available..

...IMO.. the amd build i did would out preform this intel any day.. but thats just me..

compatable ram for intel has almost double the CAS latency as it did for my amd build., but around 800mhz faster processing speed
core of the cpu has a higher nm, less cache per core/less speed frequency

i dont know.. doesnt seem like many are trying to build you a solid rig for photo editing/gaming..



This post was edited by Canadian_Born on Dec 13 2015 07:58am

Definitely this. Anything AMD has out right now can't compete with Intel.

6700k no less than shits on the 8350, for example.

I wouldn't even consider 8350 an 8 core.

You are aware you're comparing DDR3 and DDR4 ram right? DDR4 has higher bandwidth than DDR3 even though it has higher latency. DDR4 is also lower voltage and runs cooler. There is an overall performance increase with memory intensive applications when switching from DDR3 to DDR4. But the timings and latency are higher on DDR4 so I must not know what I'm talking about.

The 5930k > FX 9590 any day of the week. Clock speed isn't everything. The 9590 is just a massively overclocked 8350. Also not sure if you know this, but it also doesn't actually have 8 physical cores (hint: it only has 4) while the 5930k does, in fact, have 6 physicals cores that are multithreaded. Not even sure why you brought up the cache since, in a real world setting, has very little impact on performance. Newer lithography processes are better than the older ones too. Smaller lithography means more transistors in less surface area. Smaller litho means less power. Less power means less heat (per transistor). Intem also executes instructions more efficiently than AMD. Lets not forget that intel has higher single core performance than AMD FX chips (which has a larger impact on games).

The only thing AMD wins on is price, but you get what you pay for. Maybe you should try educating yourself before you try to give people advice on things you clearly know nothing about. Stop just staring at numbers.

I'm pretty sure he's trolling lol
making y'all write tl'dr's
i mean he did straight up say the 9590 outperforms 5930k