no that was obv one sided

lol need a real benchmark, prolly be out in 3-4 days.

they're out already by ITCM




This post was edited by SeaBear305 on Jun 21 2015 12:01pm

my face,
when u post what i troll posted for the colorful barz lovers few days ago

"Well, at least to these leaked slides that just surfaced on the web. The tests are posted by Korean tech publication ITCM.co.kr. R9 Fury X score higher than the GTX Titan X in all three tests, while the R9 Fury is almost as fast as the GTX 980 Ti.
These benchmarks should be taken with a huge grain of salt of course, I think they are artificially calculated. I say so as the name in the charts seem to refer to DG Lee, famous for posting 'guestimated' results on the web claiming they are real. But hey .. have a peek and obviously as always, draw your own conclusions."

I mean, fury x will prolly still be close/worth it, but waiting for a real bench in 3-4days from few sources > relying on those barz from 1 "leaked"

i dunno if ur serious or not. I'll stick wit the R9 .. U can go ahead n get the 980


there's more on youtube by other companys . pretty close to those results.. but hey I guess they're all wrong as well -.-

This post was edited by SeaBear305 on Jun 21 2015 12:31pm

explain/find out why AMD pulled their bench from kitguru then. The reason is dumb for us consumers, good for amd.

if you read my earlier post I've already stated that those where one sided and I myself do not believe amd / kitguru bench marks. thats why I've looked up multiple 3rd partys benchmarks.

I just Googled for Fury X benchmarks, founds tons of them, they're all identical, they are all internal, aka from AMD.

Apparently sometime around June 24th, the "out in the field" benchmarks will start rolling out.

ur hilarious, so u dont believe an unbiased reputable source and don't care for the reason why AMD decided to pull out
yet u rely on "multiple" guestimated results approved by AMD.

Again, wait 3-4 days from real "multiple, 3rd party benchmarks"
not saying Fury X is shit or anything, it's just better to rely on real unbiased reviews.
aren't you curious what "negative" result kitguru found out, that AMD wants to cover up for a few days?

not curios at all . I go with 3rd party also that are not biassed, as stated above i do not believe amd benchmarks I rely on 3rd party to get the legit markings





Ok bud if u say so. So a 5 min google search are all the benchmarkings.

This post was edited by SeaBear305 on Jun 21 2015 02:25pm