Price: $169
Ryzen 1400
4 Cores
8 Threads
3.2 / 3.4 Ghz unlocked
8MB L3 / 1MB per core
65 W


Price: $139
AMD FX-8350
4 Cores
8 Threads
4 / 4.2 Ghz
8MB L3 / 1MB per Core
125 W

Price: $65
Intel G4560
2 Cores
4 Threads
3.5 Ghz
3MB Cache
54 W

So, other than saving $10 off your YEARLY bill for power consumption

How is this CPU worth purchasing?

Do you overclock it to be as fast as the FX 8350 and cool it down easier?

How exactly is this as competitive as a G4560 priced at only $65 for gaming, where single/duo core performance is master.



https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html ^ Source

How is Ryzen being competitive? What tricks do they have to improve gaming experience when the games will not utilize the cores?

I can see Ryzen being extremely useful for mobile / laptops and micro builds with low power demand. But, I don't see how this is a big increase.

Someone educate me on why these numbers(Ryzen 1400) are better for entry-level gaming builds?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrKFPTgs32I

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-G4560-vs-AMD-FX-8350/3892vs1489

This post was edited by d2jspNA on Mar 16 2017 08:02pm

wait for benchmarks

Should be around an i5 maybe if it OCs this time worth a flying fuck

its gonna be a 2+2core dual ccx chip

useless

It's like everything amd does
Not better
But better bang for buck
Do ppl not realize this
It's like I'm taking crazy pills

Might still be fucked with the ccx thing
But could possibly clock way higher

We wait and see

Eh who knows

it's a decent chip for 8 threads on paper so it sounds

The ccx thing is kinda fucking dumb though
Why?

Haven't kept up with ryzen since the failed hype

wtf is ccx

It has to do with infinity fab and linking caches together and some other guff

If it is the issue on the first place

This post was edited by yupitsmeh on Mar 16 2017 08:40pm