Valley scores correctly regardless of your physical monitor resolution, providing you had set the benchmark correctly, ExtremeHD will scale at 1920x1080 so your results will be true.
I run a 2560x1080 Dell, but i will bench Valley on 1920x1080.

My 1920x1080 scores = 56xx
My 2560x1080 scores - 48xx

Valley is correct.
And this is compared with hundreds of similar scores on OCN Valley thread.

This post was edited by Battleship on Aug 2 2013 02:52pm

Dude Valley doesn't even correctly identify the VRAM on the TITAN so "Valley runs correctly" is just wrong lol


/e Do YOU have a link to the OCN Valley thread?

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 02:57pm

i like to feel pretty , makes me feel good inside my body and mentally , unlike the majority of things i do AFK.
and i get to learn more beauty tricks by watching videos like that

Ghot, your scores are normal for ExtremeHD, compare your own scores with the hundreds of other Titan owners at OCN.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1360884/official-top-30-unigine-valley-benchmark-1-0/0_100

either does directx at times,

which is expected as dx11 came out in 2009....well Win 7's version did

So safe to say your Valley results are correct, despite the VRAM, which every other TITAN owner suffers.

I'm not talking about those scores.....I'm talking about WWI's post




every other TITAN ..yes but Valley does identify the 780's VRAM correctly...which is what I'm talking about...so until Unigine gets that worked out...can't really compare TITAN's to 780's using Valley anyways

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 03:14pm

I'm aware of that, you posted your Valley scores in response to a 2560x1440 benchmark WWI posted.
if you ran Valley at 2560x1440, id put money on your scores being similar to WWI benchmarks.



You're kidding right?


This post was edited by Battleship on Aug 2 2013 03:14pm

On what CPU ???

That's why his pic is useless without a link that provides context.