Lol doesn't matter, the cryorig will perform similarly if not better than the 212, plus it looks nicer, fits cases more due to low height, less worrying about tall rams getting in the way etc. Etc.

Cant go wrong with either coolers

its ghotlogic you dealing with, stats, facts and sources dont mean shit cuz hes biased

No, that's not it. We have ONE review on this CPU cooler. For the Hyper 212 EVO we can find 100's. I'm NOT gonna experiment with other ppl's comps.
If they are on a budget, I'm gonna recommend the Hyper 212 EVO.

If some other sites back up the Techradar review of the Cryorig H7...hell, I may even buy one.

Tweaktown and tpu

Yeah, that's one of the reasons, these are fishy results.

Check this, then check the Tweaktown results and the techpowerup results.


http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/915?vs=923

Tweaktown has the Noctua NH-D14 kicking the Cryorig's ass in overclocked load, and at stock load they are neck n neck.

Anandtech has the Hyper 2112 EVO and the Noctua NH-D14 at neck n neck.

Yet Techpowerup has the Cryorig kicking the Hyper 212's ass.

Like I said...something's fishy.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 12 2016 06:32pm

Idbe worried about those results more than another sites considering they aren't even close in real life

Well there is a lot more sites with those results than the one with the godly Cryorig results.
Like I said, earlier, if this cooler is better, it's fine by me. I just wanna see some more benchmarks.

Why wouldn't I just buy this?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883230119

It has everything I want anyway...

shitty power supply and motherboard
stock cooling

overpriced

This post was edited by sayaka on Aug 12 2016 07:44pm

cos cyberpower/10