No, post #1 shows he's on 1366, triple channel ram? Come on now, obvious is obvious

Well that is true. I didn't stop to think the Assassin 1 has the magazine and the Assassin 2 has the pistol.

1366 and 2011. Easy mistake.

page 3 is more then obvious.

ninja can't figure out we're talking about wattage in a discussion about wattage, I don't think he can catch anything. No matter how obvious it is.





Further proving myself correct:

http://www.hwcompare.com/12659/geforce-gtx-680-vs-geforce-gtx-690/

Two 690's eats more wattage than two 680's therefore an SLI of those two would want a 1000w power supply

I'm out, I win.

This post was edited by GRATS on Aug 12 2012 11:58pm

i lol'd
1366 and 2011 are far different.



give him a break, he likes ocn and thinks he "knows" people that aren't "rands" cuz they're from ocn

Ok buddy. How much should his PSU be? Besides I mixed the boards and processors up boohoo LOL. I wasn't eye fucking his pc while beating off. LMFAO!!!!!! Next subject. It's best I rage on here btw, other wise I sometimes snap at my wife. I do like you guys and you are all smart. You're just my anger outlet.

I looked at OP pic for about 3 seconds and came to last page, don't get upset and start calling out your delusional views upon things, please.

I was just stating that he really doesn't need that processor. even a system like that with just 2 SLI would be fine on like 850. I can sli two 680's with my 3930k and I get to like 70% load on the power supply, with liquid cooling and all that homo stuff... sure I don't have as many lights. oh well and yes, that is the 2011 socket.

Wow you is dumb. Really, really dumb.. Lol

You quoted toms garbage ware on here? 1 690 uses 300 watts. 2 SLI 680 USES MORE! Why you ask? Because each 680 pulls 195W each. "Why.. Gee-golly Mr. Sushi! That's 390W total! 90 watts more than a 690!" Right you are Timmy!

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5795/nvidia-unveils-geforce-gtx-690-dual-gk104-flagship-launching-may-3rd

Look who's dumb..
1. you can't read a URL correctly, or figure out how to find tom
2. your link shows the exact same data
3. you can't read 300 watts on the page I linked, while mine shows 300 watts?
4. you call me dumb at the same time proving me correct.. all this arguing you've done previously, and you help me? Thanks!

damn you not too smart huh?







just for you, little guy.

fyi stop +1ing this thread.

This post was edited by GRATS on Aug 13 2012 12:09am

Lol I'm actually just trying to piss you off. LOL