Yes, just like the mouse post, you're wrong here as well.


If someone posted a thread "what is 2+2" and I answered 4 in there

technically you'd have known the answer before me, because you knew the answer before I was born.

But that doesn't matter. Because I posted it in the thread first. Same deal with the mouse post. That is the logic of the thread and I posted it first there.

Yeah, how could a multi million dollar company afford to pay someone, pennies a day to keep their reputation and the facts posted on Wikipedia....up to date.

Hell, they probably don't even NEED a person to do that, just a small app that flags a live person when the info about ASUS on Wikipedia is altered, by anyone at any time.



/e





Bro you were busted plain as day. Only ppl you fooled were some of the newer folks to this forum.

The browser history can't lie, but you can.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jan 11 2016 09:25pm

hey guys.

Wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia. Last semester when I was taking my Information Technology class, the professor would not allow us to use Wikipedia as a source for any credible information. Most universities won't. Why? Because it is edited by users and not proofread by anybody to validate the information within the articles.

However, you'll still tell me I'm wrong. So, I'll post this from Wikipedia themselves: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

So, again you're using a source that might be close to the actual truth but lacks a lot of credible information.

Also, without access to a whole article, which I have posted twice the reasoning behind the split, then you cannot know the whole story behind it. It's like reading a headline stating "Man shoots dog!" without reading the whole context that he shot the dog because it was arabid and attacking children.

For someone who claims to have sooooooooo many degrees, you seem to lack the fundamentals of basic credible research. If you're going to attempt to call me a liar again then please show me what lie when I have posted very credible sources that have basically said the exact same thing I have said. You are taking one or two sentences and using them as your "proof".

Bro the whole world know that about Wikipedia.

Btw, the professor didn't let you use it so you would LEARN.


As for the whole story behind the split, I was posting it in the news forum (not the current one, but the one before that one), before you ever posted on this forum.


From sites like these, not from Wikipedia. Unfortunately, it would be next to impossible to find those articles on these sites today....they'd be buried in the archives somewhere, if I could even access them....



http://www.maximumpc.com/
http://www.anandtech.com/
http://arstechnica.com/
http://www.fudzilla.com/
http://www.bit-tech.net/
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/
http://www.hardocp.com/
http://www.hardwarelook.com/
http://www.wired.com/
http://www.techradar.com/
http://vr-zone.com/
http://hothardware.com/
http://www.techpowerup.com/
http://www.engadget.com/
http://www.xbitlabs.com/
http://www.hexus.net/
http://www.geek.com/
http://www.legitreviews.com/
http://www.zdnet.com/
http://slashdot.org/
http://www.shacknews.com/
http://www.ign.com/
http://techzwn.com/
http://www.digitimes.com/index.asp
http://www.groklaw.net/index.php
http://www.imaging-resource.com/
http://www.pcmag.com/
http://www.pcgamer.com/
http://www.pcworld.com/
http://blog.wired.com/
--------------------
http://bbs.blackviper.com/index.php
http://www.blackviper.com/
http://www.houseofhelp.com/v2/
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/
http://www.tomshardware.com/
http://forum.zonelabs.org/zonelabs
--------------------
http://overclockersclub.com/index.php
http://www.ocforums.com/index.php
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/

3 people asked you to prove your claims, 5 people are against you

it's pretty clear you were busted plain as day, otherwise you'd have at least 1 person who agreed with you, and you don't. Lying pos..


firefox browsing history takes less than a minute to edit, as well. But regardless it could be set to 30 years ago, as I explained in very detailed, easy to understand logic. You lose either way due to jsp post times.

This post was edited by GRATS on Jan 11 2016 09:42pm

Just checked anandtech they go back to 2008 and nothing about the split. Let me check all of these real quick.

Here you go sparky: http://www.maximumpc.com/asus-follows-in-acers-footsteps-spins-off-its-manufacturing-business/
way back in 2010. Yep splitting off it's contract business meaning the part where they sell motherboards. Who's the manufacturer? Pegatron. Oops, where's your proof now? One of your own sources. Also, who did they get to make their motherboards? Pegatron? Nooooooo they went to ECS. Shall I post that one as well? Or are you going to keep this facade of you actually knowing anything at some point? Point is, regardless of the brand name on the board, they were manufctured by Pegatron. They were then sold to contract customers such as Dell, HP and others. Now, are you happy?

This post was edited by Deny on Jan 11 2016 09:56pm

can someone give me a tl:dr

ghot's wrong as usual, makes stuff up

ok but whats he wrong about is what i'm after.