d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Computers & IT > Amd Piledriver Thread > Discuss Everything Here
Prev13456714Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,450
Joined: Mar 25 2012
Gold: 158.71
Jul 16 2012 05:10pm
Quote
The top-performing chip will be the FX-8350, which will feature 16MB of cache, 4GHz default clock speed for its eight cores, and 4.2GHz turbo speed. It will also include an unlocked multiplier, so expert overclockers could hit 5GHz speeds with their tweaks. It should replace the FX-8150 as the top desktop processor available from AMD.


http://www.zdnet.com/amd-readies-trio-of-new-eight-core-fx-desktop-processors-for-october-release-7000000952/

looks nice
they're still saying it's going to be the am3+ socket.
Member
Posts: 33,035
Joined: Jan 6 2008
Gold: 64.00
Jul 16 2012 05:51pm
so basically still stuck on 850 sb awsome amd must not want money


there is a reason intel replaces their chipsets almost every arch leap dont see why amd still this dumb z.z
Member
Posts: 3,417
Joined: May 15 2009
Gold: 1,201.69
Jul 16 2012 08:14pm
Data Pre-fetcher
Improved Scheduling
Faster instuction
Efficiency improvements

:drool:
Member
Posts: 3,417
Joined: May 15 2009
Gold: 1,201.69
Jul 16 2012 08:16pm
Quote (southpark247 @ Jul 16 2012 03:51pm)
so basically still stuck on 850 sb awsome amd must not want money


there is a reason intel replaces their chipsets almost every arch leap dont see why amd still this dumb z.z



8150=2500k

8350=i7 ivy

Intel doesn't completely change there archetechture.
They simply change a few things around.
Member
Posts: 20,159
Joined: May 24 2008
Gold: 100.00
Jul 16 2012 08:20pm
Quote (marioo1182 @ Jul 16 2012 09:16pm)
8150=2500k

8350=i7 ivy

Intel doesn't completely change there archetechture.
They simply change a few things around.


He was saying "Every arch leap". AMD hasn't changed shit in their chips.
Member
Posts: 16,450
Joined: Mar 25 2012
Gold: 158.71
Jul 16 2012 08:21pm
Quote (marioo1182 @ Jul 16 2012 10:16pm)
8150=2500k

8350=i7 ivy

Intel doesn't completely change there archetechture.
They simply change a few things around.


:wallbash: you're comparing different things and not explaining it right.
Member
Posts: 3,417
Joined: May 15 2009
Gold: 1,201.69
Jul 16 2012 08:31pm
Quote (dolarsignzeroxeighty @ Jul 16 2012 06:21pm)
:wallbash: you're comparing different things and not explaining it right.


Was meaning that even though they haven't changed their arch doesn't mean they make bad chips.
For the first part of what I said in my qoute, this should explain it.

Member
Posts: 105,123
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jul 16 2012 09:08pm
Quote (Mastrshok @ Jul 16 2012 10:20pm)
He was saying "Every arch leap". AMD hasn't changed shit in their chips.



Actually the Bulldozer was a radical change...since then the only thing I would imagine they would change is to make it work better with Windows ^^
Member
Posts: 16,450
Joined: Mar 25 2012
Gold: 158.71
Jul 25 2012 04:13pm
APU's NEWS



link to article : http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20120724134546_AMD_s_New_Low_Power_Micro_Architecture_to_Support_AVX_BMI_Other_New_Instructions.html
article itself

Quote
Current low-power microprocessors based on AMD Bobcat and Intel Bonnell micro-architectures do not support a number of modern instructions, such as SSE4 or AVX. Nonetheless, the upcoming AMD Jaguar micro-architecture will fully support not only SSE4, but also AVX, BMI and many other instructions, just like high-end Bulldozer/Piledriver cores.

Advanced Micro Devices recently disclosed to the GCC community how to enable support for its next-gen low-power micro-architecture code-named Jaguar, which the chip designer calls "btver2" internally. Based on the information released by AMD, the Jaguar low-power micro-architecture will support a set of instructions found in high-performance Bulldozer/Piledriver sores, including SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, PCLMUL, AVX, BMI, F16C as well as MOVBE.

It is necessary to note that execution of 256-bit AVX instructions requires either two 128-bit floating point units (FPUs) or one 256-bit FPU (or four 64-bit FPUs, which may not be the best solution). Considering the fact that Jaguar is a low-power/low-cost design, both options seem rather unlikely as are expensive to implement. Nonetheless, it is possible that AMD will change the design of Jaguar rather significantly compared to Bobcat and will move towards modular Bulldozer-like approach. In addition, Jaguar cores will be able to address 2MB of cache, not 512KB like Bobcat, which likely points to unified level-two (L2) cache of the new x86 core.



It is expected that Jaguar-powered Fusion accelerated processing units will sport improved performance thanks to higher IPC (instructions per clock), enhancements related to HSA (heterogeneous system architecture) and simultaneous operation of x86 and stream processing cores. Besides, the new Fusion APUs will integrate input/output controller, which will allow to make personal computers using just one highly-integrated system-on-chip.

AMD's Jaguar cores will be utilized inside code-named Kabini and Temash accelerated processing units and will be implemented using 28nm process technology. For low-cost/low-power systems AMD is developing code-named Kabini accelerated processing units, which features two or four Jaguar x86 cores as well as GCN graphics processing engine. For tablets and similar ultra low power applications, AMD preps APU known as Temash, which will also use Jaguar x86 core(s) and low-power graphics adapter.

AMD is expected to unveil more details about Jaguar in late August at Hot Chips conference.


This post was edited by dolarsignzeroxeighty on Jul 25 2012 04:16pm
Member
Posts: 33,035
Joined: Jan 6 2008
Gold: 64.00
Jul 25 2012 05:47pm
Quote (marioo1182 @ Jul 16 2012 09:16pm)
8150=2500k

8350=i7 ivy

Intel doesn't completely change there archetechture.
They simply change a few things around.


amd goes from k 10.5 ? to current buldozer and keeps their nb n sb that run older athlons the same


when i said a arch leap i meant like when intel does a tock sandy n ivy r same just die shrinks really few things changed but not enuff for a new mobo


amd been using same old crap for 4 years if not mistaken i mean you going from phenom to basically hyper threading and dont rework your mobos to releave pressure
Go Back To Computers & IT Topic List
Prev13456714Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll