Quote (RedTea @ Mar 20 2012 04:33pm)
I heard great things about the death adder and liked it while it worked, but I went through two of them in 3 months.
I could have just gotten unlucky, but I never bought a Razer product after that.
Quote (silentdeathz @ Mar 20 2012 04:46pm)
Seems that way to me. I'd had three deathadders over the past 5 years,
First - Was a tool and ripped some of the grip finish off while cleaning - so decided to get a new one once I'd worn through the mousefeet.
Second - Bought a used one (was from a closing LAN centre type place) - started double clicking and the 'grip' covering wears down a bit over time, was cba to open it up, so bought a new one with the updated sensor and braided cord.
Third - Still going strong.
Number of times I've replaced mousefeet through use with DA - Probably like 4 times. One thing about the DA is that doubling up the mosuefeet can help because of the low clearance at the back - although on the newer DA I think they made the base mousefeet thicker.
Have used some difference mice inbetween then etc, but DA remains my favourite mouse. Probably due to it being relatively cheap, having a great shape, and thumb buttons you can actually press. Its difficult to argue with deathadders at like $40, and you're likely to get a free set of replacement mousefeet etc too.
Pretty much all of the features on new mice suc has 49230482309483274032dpi are redundant, so you're only paying for the shape + aesthetic design. Both of which I think the DA has down very well. Some mice ofc like the R.A.T for example are much more customisable / you cant change the weight of a DA, but I cant say I've yearned for either. I tried the RAT ages ago and hated it, but the newer versions of it are probably better.
This is exactly why you can't use your experience or your friends experience as data in an argument.
It is too tiny of a fraction of the whole to sample data from.
One guy may go through 30 DAs while another will have one that lasts for a decade.
Even with a 99% failure rate, you could get that lucky and be that one person who got a working component.
For example OCZ drives, someone will say theirs works fine, but then you sample the internet as a whole and thousands upon thousands of people are having massive issues. The fact that theirs if fine proves nothing and is irrelevant to any discussion.
People want to see official numbers of failure rates and ask for a 'source' but you seriously expect OCZ or any company to release data like that? No, will never happen.
EDIT: I should honestly put this in my sig lol, comes up so much.
This post was edited by Grief_exe on Mar 20 2012 06:36pm