To be honest I don't remember.
I went to EVGA's website and they only have the 710, 730 and 750 Ti still listed.

heres a chart for you and thank you for playing
https://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/introducing-the-geforce-gtx-780-ti

Lol. Yeah it looks like the 780 Ti was a cranked up 780. I mean in specs, and both were somewhat related to the Titan.
I should remember that, I have a Titan and 789 Ti.

I'm just tired I guess.

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 6 2017 02:22pm

this is completely true, and goes for speeds over 3ghz in general since that seems to be where the failure rate starts to rise noticeably
https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/131739-microsoft-analyzes-over-a-million-pc-failures-results-shatter-enthusiast-myths

im with Ghot on this one. the evidence is empiricsl.

This post was edited by DCSS on Sep 6 2017 03:39pm

Lol Microsoft study with crashes hmm
And what did conclusion say?
The limitations of the study are such that we can’t draw absolute conclusions from this data
Everyone knows the overclocks are going to last years same settings
My old q6600 is running in nephews pc still 3.2 on zalman cnps9900

Evidence is shit post another source plz do

This post was edited by yupitsmeh on Sep 6 2017 05:16pm

Fixed

Heat from increased voltage kills stuff not the frequency lmao. What the hell is that bullshit article

i mean the PDF is there, i've read it, you can read it for yourself
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/eurosys84-nightingale.pdf
ill even screenshot one of the pages for maximum spoonfeed



im not sure what limitations you're talking about exactly, it's quite a thorough study.

This post was edited by DCSS on Sep 6 2017 07:47pm

Spoon feed?
What did conclusion say?
And how did they collect this data?

This post was edited by yupitsmeh on Sep 6 2017 11:25pm

I recommend downloading the program SumatraPDF, it may come in handy if you encounter any PDF files in the future that you may open them.
Here's a link: https://www.sumatrapdfreader.org/free-pdf-reader.html

9. Conclusion

This paper presents the first large-scale study of hardware-
induced operating system failures on consumer machines.
Using post-hoc analysis of machine status reports and OS
crash logs, we find that:

• Failure rates are non-trivial. Hardware crash rates are
up to 1 in 190 over an 8 month observation period.

• Recurrent failures are common. Hardware crashes in-
crease in likelihood by up to two orders of magnitude af-
ter a first such crash occurs, and 20% to 40% of machines
have faults that are intermittent rather than transient.

• Recurrent failures happen quickly. As many as 97% of
recurring failures occur within 10 days of the first failure
on a machine.

• CPU speed matters. Even minor overclocking signifi-
cantly degrades reliability, and minor underclocking im-
proves reliability. Even absent overclocking, faster CPUs
become faulty more rapidly than slower CPUs.

• DRAM faults have spatial locality. Almost 80% of ma-
chines that crashed more than once from a 1-bit DRAM
failure had a recurrence at the same physical address.

• Configuration matters. Brand name desktop machines
are more reliable than white box desktops, and brand
name laptops are more reliable than brand name desk-
tops. Machines with more DRAM suffer more one-bit
and CPU errors, but fewer disk failures.

Figure 15 shows a terse summary of our findings, with
comparisons against previous results where available.