Why does it look funny.

0.7

What's funny about that?
It's overclocked, running a single display.

Id say those numbers look about right.
What that tells me across the board, the 780 OC'd can match a Titans performance even with a mild OC.

This post was edited by Battleship on Aug 2 2013 06:36pm

how about
a 780 wced
vs a titan wced
who wins then
slammed kid

um

on my lvl

Yes I said it looked like a solid set of results...just seems funny that ONE non-gaming benchmark is so far out of touch with the others.

Also. the 780 has better cooling...so the results "across the board" are skewed by that.

/e Like they asked in that topic...why didn't he put the ACX cooler on the Titan ...it would have been a more fair comparison. ^^

/ee All in all I'll stick with the Anandtech results

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 06:46pm

How is it out of touch with the others, the 780 OC across the board is 3.18% Slower.
Do you see 0.7% and think it must be wrong?

The cooling has nothing to do with the results providing it didn't effect GPU 2.0

The AnAnd tech charts don't use the Unigine benchmarks...did you notice that?

And better cooling means a higher OC...that why :/

Real issue here is why the fuck does anyone care what I bought?

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 2 2013 06:49pm

Real issue is this thread isn't closed yet.