Sleep on this lol




This post was edited by ghot on Oct 19 2011 09:05pm

lets ask ghot how good bulldozer is now
jaja

My e-cock is bigger AND thicker than ur e-cock

Shafts e-anus is bigger than yours though.

I can live with that

uh oh
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4254/triplegpu-performance-multigpu-scaling-part1

2 prove hard ocp isnt biased
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/05/03/nvidia_3way_sli_amd_trifire_redux/6

The Bottom Line



http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/05/19/quadgpu_performance_review_nvidia_vs_amd/8
Based on our evaluations here, the Radeon HD 6990 CrossFireX solution is looking like the more value oriented setup compared to GeForce GTX 590 SLI. There are many good things going for CrossFireX Quad, you have more RAM per GPU which translates into real-world gameplay improvements, the power consumption is a bit lower, availability is a bit better, and pricing isn't as harsh. We also like the ease and simple nature of AMD Eyefinity setup. When you add all of this up, Radeon HD 6990 CrossFireX is a better value.



The way things are, GeForce GTX 590 is better suited for lower resolutions, which is odd to say, but true according to our testing. When the video card is not memory bottlenecked at lower resolutions, GTX 590 SLI performs very well, though 6990 CFX is a slight step ahead each time, it is still competitive at lower resolutions. But if you want to go for that high resolution display setup, only the Radeon HD 6990 CrossFireX will provide that Quad-GPU experience you are looking for.

6970+6990=1k
2 cheapest 580s in sli =940


ps

i wonder what seasonics new psu
can power

Damnit now i miss PhysX on AMD cards -.-
Nvidia and AMD together and create some insane cards for a fair price

Monopolies are always bad

Not to mention illegal

Nvidia refuses to update their PhysX code to support CPUs.

Physx hack up in this bitch, AMD+Physx=jizz