Quote (silentdeathz @ Mar 19 2012 11:41am)
"NKRO isn't for typing? Someone is a slow typist ^.^"
= You're implying that NKRO is needed(or will offer some improvement) for typing unless you're a "slow typist", which is just complete BS. Yes, you didnt explicitly say "YOU MUST HAVE NKRO OR U CANT TYPE", but not even you would say something that stupid since it'd make 99% of keyboards worthless.
False. A logical implication only exists if there is no possible counter example. First let's translate this into some logic, so we can formalize it.
N:= NKRO is needed for typing
F:= You are a fast typist
N
∴ F
As you can see, they are not even related. I could easily just toss in a P v ~P and the argument would still be just the same.
Ever taken a logic class, silent? Try using some replacement rules and other rules to get to that conclusion. It's impossible.
e. My rebuttal to your edit is as such:
You are making the mistake of categorizing everything in his list to being a shitty typist. He would more than likely talking about the longer life and higher accuracy. We can't say for certain, though; we lack proof.
This post was edited by BreakPoint on Mar 19 2012 12:47pm