d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Computers & IT > Whats Under Your Hood? > Case & Interior
Prev191011121329Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jul 16 2014 12:37pm
Quote (Bankai @ Jul 16 2014 01:36pm)
yeah, rats nest free. many users here in CHD take care of their pc's :)


Cable management could be a bit better, but there was no better option to route those cables going past the south bridge, unfortunately.
Banned
Posts: 1,172
Joined: Jul 13 2014
Gold: 0.26
Jul 16 2014 12:48pm
Quote (Bankai @ Jul 16 2014 02:36pm)
yeah, rats nest free. many users here in CHD take care of their pc's :)


Well hey when it's all you got.. B)
Banned
Posts: 22,577
Joined: Mar 11 2013
Gold: 0.00
Jul 16 2014 12:54pm
Quote (March_man @ Jul 16 2014 11:25am)
i5 3570k > AMD

Have a good day


i5 3570k is actually like toe to toe with an 8350 with no overclocking on either lol. 8350 way better in streaming too
gotta remember they were released to compete with eachother
Banned
Posts: 1,172
Joined: Jul 13 2014
Gold: 0.26
Jul 16 2014 12:56pm
Quote (Sayaka @ Jul 16 2014 02:54pm)
i5 3570k is actually like toe to toe with an 8350 with no overclocking on either lol. 8350 way better in streaming too
gotta remember they were released to compete with eachother


The i5 is still better right. Word is the piledriver is only "comparable" to the 2500k right?
Banned
Posts: 22,577
Joined: Mar 11 2013
Gold: 0.00
Jul 16 2014 12:58pm
Quote (March_man @ Jul 16 2014 11:56am)
The i5 is still better right. Word is the piledriver is only "comparable" to the 2500k right?


eh, wot? no it's not.
i literally just said the 3570k == fx8350
the 8350 better than the 2500k if what i said is true
and it is.
Banned
Posts: 1,172
Joined: Jul 13 2014
Gold: 0.26
Jul 16 2014 01:10pm
Quote (Sayaka @ Jul 16 2014 02:58pm)
eh, wot? no it's not.
i literally just said the 3570k == fx8350
the 8350 better than the 2500k if what i said is true
and it is.


I know what you said and i know what the experts said.
Member
Posts: 28,431
Joined: Mar 6 2007
Gold: 0.00
Trader: Mediator
Jul 16 2014 01:10pm
Quote (Sayaka @ Jul 16 2014 11:58am)
eh, wot? no it's not.
i literally just said the 3570k == fx8350
the 8350 better than the 2500k if what i said is true
and it is.

prepare for the troll to tell you
"AMD doesn't compare"
Banned
Posts: 1,172
Joined: Jul 13 2014
Gold: 0.26
Jul 16 2014 01:11pm
Quote (March_man @ Jul 16 2014 03:10pm)
I know what you said and i know what the experts said.


Don't forget the bulldozer was to compete with intel as well - did that hold any water?
Member
Posts: 35,271
Joined: Jan 13 2007
Gold: 3,468.37
Jul 16 2014 01:16pm
Quote (Sayaka @ Jul 16 2014 11:58am)
eh, wot? no it's not.
i literally just said the 3570k == fx8350
the 8350 better than the 2500k if what i said is true
and it is.


I'd still take the 2500k over an 8350 for gaming, much stronger IPC. The 8350 will act as a quad-core in games that don't support INT operations; Obviously the FX will do much better with video encoding and whatnot.
Member
Posts: 16,450
Joined: Mar 25 2012
Gold: 158.71
Jul 16 2014 05:20pm
Quote (March_man @ Jul 16 2014 03:11pm)
Don't forget the bulldozer was to compete with intel as well - did that hold any water?


cuz yeah
fx 83xx , fx 43xx and fx 63xx use bulldozer and not piledriver architecture :bonk:
Go Back To Computers & IT Topic List
Prev191011121329Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll