d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Computers & IT > Best Thing You Can Do With $1400 > Ghot's Build Of The Day
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 104,578
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Jun 1 2011 11:40am
Quote (Canadian_Man @ Jun 1 2011 01:26pm)
1333MHz RAM... this stuff is better: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231428&cmre=g.skill16008gb--20-231-428--Product

stock cooler GTX 580... this one is better: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127567&cmre=gtx580--14-127-567--Product

Asus P8P67 DELUXE and yet you pick a Hyper 212+ as the cooler?

I have a feeling you posted this build simply because you've had a boner for that Corsair case lately.

If you put a cheaper case into the build ($60 case) and got an Asus P8P67 Pro or equivalent motherboard, for the same price one could have an i7 2600k in that build instead. And would the build have a greater chance of breaking? Of course not. But there'd be more performance ^_^





Hyper 212+ tests at at only 1C over the Prolimatec...


couldn't find the online CM 212 + vs. the Prolimatec...but gaze at this:




COPY PASTA from Max PC review

At first glance, the Hyper 212 Plus seems like Cooler Master’s original Hyper 212 with a different fan mounting system and support for sockets 1156 and 1366. But while the original had two sets of heat dissipation fins, one set for each end of the heat pipes, the 212 Plus adopts a more straightforward tower design, with the heatsink fins connected to both ends of each heat pipe. It’s the same basic and effective design seen in all of today’s top-performing air coolers. And unlike most coolers, the 212 Plus’s heat pipes contact the CPU directly. So, how do the Hyper 212 Plus’s stacks stack up against the competition?

The Hyper 212 Plus is one of the smaller air coolers we’ve tested recently—a big relief after last month’s monstrous Scythe Mugen 2. At 4.7 inches wide, 3.1 inches deep, and 6.2 inches high, the Hyper 212 is shorter than our champion, Thermalright’s U120, though it’s about an inch deeper. It’s also about a pound lighter, at 1.4 pounds to the Thermalright’s 2-plus pounds. Despite its relative lack of bulk, though, it managed to bump right up against the north-bridge heat spreaders on our EVGA 680i SLI board—a problem that would be avoided if the cooler’s fins started a half-inch higher up the pipes. To install the 212 Plus, we had to insert four standoff pegs into the motherboard and tighten them by bolting them to the backplate. An x-shaped bracket with spring screws at the corners holds the cooler to the CPU. We like this approach because it makes the cooler easy to install without having to worry about the backplate falling off, and the standoffs allow the use of shorter screws for the mounting bracket. Once the cooler was secure, we mounted the included 12cm fan using common wire retention clips—a simple task made difficult by the close proximity of the cooler to the north bridge’s cooling fins.


The Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus's heat pipes contact the CPU directly, which helps it compete with larger coolers.

The direct-contact heat pipes make the cooler/CPU interface less uniform than we’re used to—there are definite ridges between the heat pipes and the rest of the heat exchanger. But after testing the Hyper 212 Plus, we wonder if Cooler Master knows something the rest of the industry doesn’t, because the 212 Plus’s cooling power is formidable. At 100 percent CPU utilization, the 212 Plus cooled our CPU to 43.5 C, nearly 30 percent lower than the stock cooler’s 61 C. Our previous favorite, the Thermalright U120 eXtreme, by comparison, cooled it to 46.75 C. Idle temps for both coolers were nearly identical—about 15 percent cooler than stock.

We’ve seen a spate of top-performing air coolers in the past few months, as nearly every manufacturer hops on the skyscraper-design bandwagon, and Cooler Master’s entry is right up there with the best we’ve tested. And at $30 from Cooler Master’s online store, it’s dirt cheap. For that price, you really can’t go wrong with this cooler.
Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus

This post was edited by ghot on Jun 1 2011 11:50am
Member
Posts: 35,075
Joined: Jul 26 2006
Gold: 125.00
Jun 1 2011 12:08pm
No need to spam your own topic with a copy paste of a review... I'm well aware of what the Hyper 212+ is...

My comments still remain on page 1

This post was edited by Canadian_Man on Jun 1 2011 12:09pm
Member
Posts: 11,918
Joined: Jul 2 2005
Gold: 30,603.01
Jun 1 2011 12:09pm
Samsung Spinpoint F3 is faster, quieter, runs cooler, but has slightly worse access time than Caviar blacks. It's better for the price. Also, you picked the 6.0 Gb/s which is why its marked up to $90 lol.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152185&Tpk=spinpointf3

Quote (Canadian_Man @ Jun 1 2011 01:08pm)
No need to spam your own topic with a copy paste of a review... I'm well aware of what the Hyper 212+ is...

My comments still remain on page 1


implying I'm not still on page 1 :D

This post was edited by camopk on Jun 1 2011 12:10pm
Member
Posts: 35,075
Joined: Jul 26 2006
Gold: 125.00
Jun 1 2011 12:11pm
Quote (camopk @ Jun 1 2011 11:09am)
Samsung Spinpoint F3 is faster, quieter, runs cooler, but has slightly worse access time than Caviar blacks. It's better for the price. Also, you picked the 6.0 Gb/s which is why its marked up to $90 lol.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152185&Tpk=spinpointf3


Thought the SATA 6.0GB/s revision was faster? I got a SATA 6.0GB/s WD Blue and it's definitely faster than the SATA 3.0GB/s WD Blue downstairs by a noticeable amount. Although I haven't looked at review charts.

Anyways the one you linked has great reviews so I would say that's definitely a good choice... I've seen a lot of recent drives (mine included) getting bad reviews due to drive failures.
Member
Posts: 104,578
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Jun 1 2011 12:13pm
Quote (camopk @ Jun 1 2011 02:09pm)
Samsung Spinpoint F3 is faster, quieter, runs cooler, but has slightly worse access time than Caviar blacks. It's better for the price. Also, you picked the 6.0 Gb/s which is why its marked up to $90 lol.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152185&Tpk=spinpointf3

implying I'm not still on page 1  :D



this is the 6Gb/s 64MB cache WD 1TB Caviar black ^^ not the older 16MB and 32MB versions ^^
This caviar Black will smoke that Spinpoint bro ^^

This post was edited by ghot on Jun 1 2011 12:15pm
Member
Posts: 11,918
Joined: Jul 2 2005
Gold: 30,603.01
Jun 1 2011 12:15pm
Quote (Canadian_Man @ Jun 1 2011 01:11pm)
Thought the SATA 6.0GB/s revision was faster? I got a SATA 6.0GB/s WD Blue and it's definitely faster than the SATA 3.0GB/s WD Blue downstairs by a noticeable amount. Although I haven't looked at review charts.

Anyways the one you linked has great reviews so I would say that's definitely a good choice... I've seen a lot of recent drives (mine included) getting bad reviews due to drive failures.


Bro your Vertex 2 SSD cant even saturate 3.0 Gb/s. It's just marketing to drive the price up. Only reason to get anything 6.0Gb/s is for gen 3 SSD's cuz 3.0Gb/s would bottleneck them.
Member
Posts: 104,578
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Jun 1 2011 12:15pm
Quote (camopk @ Jun 1 2011 02:15pm)
Bro your Vertex 2 SSD cant even saturate 3.0 Gb/s. It's just marketing to drive the price up. Only reason to get anything 6.0Gb/s is for gen 3 SSD's cuz 3.0Gb/s would bottleneck them.



yeah that's why I picked a 6Gb/s SATA mobo ???
and the vertex 2 were on the sandforce 1 controller and had issues....they now on the sandforce 2 controller and a fvck of a lot faster..they will cream a 3Gb/s SATA bus

This post was edited by ghot on Jun 1 2011 12:17pm
Member
Posts: 35,075
Joined: Jul 26 2006
Gold: 125.00
Jun 1 2011 12:15pm
Quote (camopk @ Jun 1 2011 11:15am)
Bro your Vertex 2 SSD cant even saturate 3.0 Gb/s. It's just marketing to drive the price up. Only reason to get anything 6.0Gb/s is for gen 3 SSD's cuz 3.0Gb/s would bottleneck them.


*sigh*... I never said the SATA3 tech makes it faster... I'm saying the newer revision that is SATA3 is faster... <_<

again, people assuming stuff
Member
Posts: 104,578
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Jun 1 2011 12:18pm
Face it ur all just jelly...that this is such a sexy awesome build :)

and MOST important...totally noob friendly ^^

This post was edited by ghot on Jun 1 2011 12:18pm
Member
Posts: 35,075
Joined: Jul 26 2006
Gold: 125.00
Jun 1 2011 12:19pm
Quote (ghot @ Jun 1 2011 11:18am)
Face it ur all just jelly...that this is such a sexy awesome build  :)

and MOST important...totally noob friendly  ^^


T_T I'm worried that my Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB SATA 6.0GB/s hard drive is going to die... nothing is wrong with it... but look at the newegg reviews on the item... 20% 5-star... 22% 1-star
Go Back To Computers & IT Topic List
Prev12349Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll