Quote (RecenT @ May 18 2010 12:53pm)
So basicly you're telling me that the Brand is what costs more, but that does not necessarily mean the guitar itself is better?
How would I be able to differentiate from this when I'm looking around?
Materials, craftsmanship and aesthetics. Those are your price variables as well as marketing.
Materials: Wood, grade of wood, hardware, brand of hardware, materials in the hardware. Examples are Mahogany<Rosewood<Solid Rosewood, or Spruce<Solid Spruce<AAA Grade Solid Spruce. Capped Machine heads<Diecast. Plastic<Bone Saddles and nuts.
Craftsmanship: Machine Made vs. Hand made. What kind of Machine is making it? What kind of Man is making it! Taylor's cnc machinery is much more expensive than Corts ACME brand. Is this made by an American Luthier, or an American Line worker or a Chinese little boy?
Aesthetics: Type of bindings, abalone inlays in the fret board, around the sound hole. Colors and stains will be a bit more but you have to be careful with solid colors. They usually cheap out on the grades of wood on the solid color guitars ie, black.
Finally marketing. Martin and Gibson are nostalgic in acoustic guitars, so they tend to charge a higher premium simply for their history. Taylor is the self proclaimed #1 guitar builder so they charge more cause they're "The Best!" The other thing is everyone knows about materials, hardware and cosmetics. So what does a cheap manufacturer do? They put on all the things that are supposed to be on a good guitar. You can get a Waldon Guitar with a Solid top with diecast machine heads for $129. Just cause it has all the fixings doesn't mean its any good. Order a steak at a shit hole pub and order a steak from a steak house, there's a BIG difference.
I can give you 10 reasons why the Yamaha L series is head and shoulders above everything else listed but you really should go play everything to figure it out. Music is also so subjective and people are so opinionated, you can't really listen to anybody. Even yourself!