Quote (Verdena @ 11 Dec 2009 02:13)
I disagree both with the acoustic and the e-kit guys..
Obviously an acoustic kit is FAR BETTER than an e-kit..
But it's not true that someone who cannot afford an acoustic shouldn't start playing drums.
If you're good @ it you can even play with glass bottles and 2 knifes lol.
Yeah, an e-kit will never give to the drummer the "feeling" that an acoustic gives, but it's still a good instrument..
You shouldn't be so mad @ e-kits Eep even though acoustics are "better"..
(obviously depends on price, as most of things in life)
I agree with you pretty much. Started playing the drums 6 months ago and since I am living in an apartment building, I would not be able to practise at home without an e-kit. It definitely does not feel as good as an acoustic kit does (playing on one when I take lessons), but it ain't that bad either. I got a TD-9KX here and replaced the KD-8 Kickdrum by a Jobeky 18" Drum and added a VH-11 with a real hihat stand.
The only downside is that you have to pay approx. twice the money that you would have to pay to get a similar acoustic set.
I think both e- and a-drums have their place and their advantages. An e-kit is simply great to practise at home. It is awesome for cover-bands which need to change their sound between songs, it is awesome in small locations because you can lower the volume easily, it is easier to record and to mix it for the sound technician and it is nice when the sound does not matter that much, but being able to setup everything quickly is more important (carneval, party music like on october fest).
Still, the sounds do not feel that natural or granuarily defined as an acoustic kit, playing an acoustic kit is more fun and the visual appearance on a rock show just doesn't fit.
Anyway: both got their pros and cons. The right tool for the right moment.