Quote (darkgimp @ Feb 17 2010 04:08pm)
Agreed to a certain extent, i don't think beatles are much better quality than the music that is hitting the rock charts of today...
Awww cmon, you gotta give them a little more credit than that. I mean, their pop aspect aside, they actually sang their OWN vocals, without the help of auto-tune or studio magic, they actually PLAYED their own instruments, instead of just fronting a band that makes music for them. And on top of all that, they all played several instruments each and utilized them in many songs. Definitely not your run-of-the-mill pop. If they were on the same level as pop rock today, where are the "new beatles"? I don't think anyone's going to remember the jonas brothers in 100 years. There hasn't been a rock band since them to do what they did, and do it well enough to be able to stand outside their shadow. That aside, I don't think they're "over rated", they're just The Beatles. Everyone knows the beatles. Everyone knows Elvis, too. Does that make them over rated, just because more people know of them? Something is only over rated if you yourself hold it to a standard it doesn't achieve, other than that it's just other people blowing shit out of proportion, just like everyone will continue to do. I mean, they are the
best selling music artists of all time, but other than that, they aren't " the best " to me in any other category. They made some nice music I enjoy from time to time, if I'm in that kinda mood.