Starcraft

"More Work" WC Quote!

+10 years? nuff said

wc3 tft for the win, come and take me on @ europe

I've played every starcraft and warcraft there's ever been, and wc3 is the best, we'll see if sc2 makes proper arguments

This post was edited by hartwall on Sep 26 2009 05:03pm

i prefer starcraft anyday

W3 FT is the best

Starcraft ..nuff said

how about neither?

Is this a joke thread?
Starcraft easy.. Lets compare

Warcraft 3
-Crappy pro scene
-Big bubbly graphics, cant even tell whats going on
-Way too many units, like 70% of them dont even get used
-Way too many spells like 80% of them dont get used
-Way too much luck involved, (finding items, damage does 13-16 instead of solid 12)
-Its a mechanic/game senseless game.. There are no mechanics involved.. Its pretty much pure micro.
-Heroes ruin the game.. Makes you have to creep, which kills a lot of strats.
-Not very balanced.. (almost every pro uses orc, some use nightelf)
Proof -> 60% of people that play warcraft 3 only play DoTA

Starcraft
-Huge pro scene, internationally and inside of Korea.
-Graphics are simple, easy to tell whats going on, not confusing.
-Perfect amount of units, couple units arent used regularily, but are still used if certain conditions apply.
-Perfect amount of spells.
-Perfectly balanced, even with every race being extremely different
-Perfectly balanced micro, macro, mechanics and game sense.
-Game is simple to anyone playing, yet to become good at the game it requires mechanics and game sense that only people that play over 15 hours a week could understand.(by this i mean it takes more than 15 hours a week to have good mechanics/game sense, but to understand that the mechanics/game sense exists, you need to spend at least 15 hours a week playing, not to mention the game goes on, no one can be perfect at it.)
Proof -> Huge proscene in Korea even after 10 years.

[x] both crap.