d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Entertainment Room > Diablo 3 > Yeah!
Prev1234515Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Feb 14 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2008 01:00pm
uh if they make diablo have monthly fees then im not gonna buy it.
alot of other people wont either.


and you were talking about wow.
wow is THE WORST game ever.
Member
Posts: 4,238
Joined: Feb 27 2007
Gold: 3.00
Feb 19 2008 01:08pm
Quote (romanceisdead @ Tue, Feb 19 2008, 11:00am)
uh if they make diablo have monthly fees then im not gonna buy it.
alot of other people wont either.


and you were talking about wow.
wow is THE WORST game ever.


You may not buy it, but others will. You say a lot won't, but those people went to WoW anyway.

WoW may be the worst game in your opinion, but when it crushes the collective online population of Call of Duty 4, Halo 3, and other such notable titles, I'd disagree.

We're talking 10.5 million people here. Not the 150 of your e-friends and RL friends who said they don't like it.

I play both, and love both. I would pay for Diablo Online just because it's Diablo Online.
Member
Posts: 4,854
Joined: Jan 9 2005
Gold: 186.00
Feb 19 2008 01:51pm
Due to the large fanbase that Diablo II still holds I think it would be financially irresponsible to "never" release it. Of course it will take time and will be quite different from the past Diablo's as the original development team has left Blizzard and gone to Flagship (maybe? Not 100% on the name).

Diablo III or Diablo Online whatever the case may be will more than likely require a subscription fee but whining about ~$15 a month is very juvenille. Paying monthly fees means the games content is subject to change via patches.. in WoW's case mutiple instances and items that have been added through the years.


All in all I feel that eventually Diablo III will come.
Member
Posts: 6,485
Joined: Apr 5 2005
Gold: 1,390.71
Feb 19 2008 08:07pm
I am no Psychic, but I think it will depend on how well the new Starcraft hits off.
Member
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Feb 14 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2008 08:57pm
still if they put a fee...
fuck that
Member
Posts: 4,238
Joined: Feb 27 2007
Gold: 3.00
Feb 19 2008 10:31pm
Quote (OutkastWariOr @ Tue, Feb 19 2008, 11:51am)
Due to the large fanbase that Diablo II still holds I think it would be financially irresponsible to "never" release it. Of course it will take time and will be quite different from the past Diablo's as the original development team has left Blizzard and gone to Flagship (maybe? Not 100% on the name).

Diablo III or Diablo Online whatever the case may be will more than likely require a subscription fee but whining about ~$15 a month is very juvenille. Paying monthly fees means the games content is subject to change via patches.. in WoW's case mutiple instances and items that have been added through the years.


All in all I feel that eventually Diablo III will come.


I agree on pretty much everything. I just think it'd be irresponsible for them to not bring out Diablo Online because along with sales purchases, they'd have subscriber fees and be making just so much more money. The market appeal is there, so I just see them doing that. They already have Starcraft 2 coming out, and that's a sequel. I think they'll revert back to an RPG, realize the potential profit, and release Diablo Online tongue.gif.

$15 a month is so little for potentially so much fun, there's no reason to not pay it. Plus it keeps the servers running pretty damn well, and keeps the door open for expansions and such.
Member
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Feb 14 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 19 2008 11:50pm
okay the only people that pay every month to play video games are NERDS.
im not gonna fucking pay every month when i already paid for the game.
Member
Posts: 4,238
Joined: Feb 27 2007
Gold: 3.00
Feb 20 2008 12:03am
Quote (romanceisdead @ Tue, Feb 19 2008, 09:50pm)
okay the only people that pay every month to play video games are NERDS.
im not gonna fucking pay every month when i already paid for the game.


Does it make you feel better?

I pay for many games, and still have plenty of money for other things. Like my house. My 2 cars. My truck. My girlfriend. Beer. Food. Trips to Germany and Prague for concerts.

Iono. Guess being a nerd isn't so bad.
Member
Posts: 1,613
Joined: Feb 14 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Feb 20 2008 12:04am
haha yeah idk.
sorry.
im just saying teens that play wont be able to pay for it.
so its stupid.
Member
Posts: 6,397
Joined: Aug 29 2006
Gold: 0.00
Feb 20 2008 12:39am
Quote (romanceisdead @ Tue, Feb 19 2008, 10:04pm)
haha yeah idk.
sorry.
im just saying teens that play wont be able to pay for it.
so its stupid.


Teens should have jobs. And if you can't scrounge up $15 a month your family is poor and you shouldn't be on the computer.
I would rather pay $15 a month for one game I enjoy that updates than buy a new game every month for $50+ that I get bored of and forget about it.
Go Back To Entertainment Room Topic List
Prev1234515Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll