d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > FPS & Battle Royale > Battlefield Series > Battlefield 3 Thread > All Bf3 Stuff Goes Here
Prev12345415Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,007
Joined: Feb 24 2007
Gold: 11,605.43
Aug 9 2011 03:19pm
Quote (timmayX @ Aug 9 2011 04:19pm)
Lol are you serious? The gameplay may be the same (just like Call of Duty installments are the same) but the graphics are way better.


yeah the graphics for BF3 look AMAZING
Member
Posts: 6,493
Joined: Dec 4 2005
Gold: 987.00
Aug 9 2011 03:21pm
Quote (magikod @ Aug 9 2011 03:19pm)
yeah the graphics for BF3 look AMAZING


The graphics for pc Bf3 are amazing

This is the xbox 360 forum and we have yet to see any footage of it on 360

This post was edited by pzco on Aug 9 2011 03:21pm
Member
Posts: 33,012
Joined: Jan 21 2008
Gold: 120.00
Aug 9 2011 03:59pm
someone come play bfbc2 with me
Member
Posts: 40,007
Joined: Feb 24 2007
Gold: 11,605.43
Aug 9 2011 08:26pm
Quote (pzco @ Aug 9 2011 05:21pm)
The graphics for pc Bf3 are amazing

This is the xbox 360 forum and we have yet to see any footage of it on 360


This is true, I would get it for PC but all my buddies are going to get it for 360, so I guess I have to get it for 360 as well. :blink:
Member
Posts: 77,595
Joined: Jun 23 2008
Gold: 0.64
Aug 9 2011 08:36pm
Quote (magikod @ Aug 9 2011 10:26pm)
This is true, I would get it for PC but all my buddies are going to get it for 360, so I guess I have to get it for 360 as well.  :blink:


Im getting it for pc
and mw3 for 360 ^^
shits much better on pc and youll find new friends on pc :)
i know lot of other people that are doing the same

This post was edited by Patryk1991 on Aug 9 2011 08:37pm
Member
Posts: 28,728
Joined: Mar 29 2008
Gold: 2,985.63
Aug 9 2011 08:38pm
Quote (Patryk1991 @ 10 Aug 2011 04:36)
Im getting it for pc
and mw3 for 360 ^^
shits much better on pc and youll find new friends on pc :)
i know lot of other people that are doing the same


its a lie and you know it :angry:
Member
Posts: 77,595
Joined: Jun 23 2008
Gold: 0.64
Aug 9 2011 09:21pm
"With October 25 fast approaching, I have come up with a number of reasons as to why Battlefield 3 will be the best shooter to come out this year, especially over Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. Before anyone starts screaming “fanboy” and “paid by DICE” know that I am a huge fan of both games but I just see more potential in Battlefield than in the Call of Duty series as a whole. So here goes my point of view as to why I believe Battlefield 3 will be the best shooter we will see this year.

My first, and biggest, reason that Battlefield 3 will shut out the competition this year is that since it doesn’t see an annual release, the developers have had time to put care into every single aspect of their game ranging from animations to content. With Call of Duty games seeing a yearly release, its hard for the devs to come up with very many new ideas before they come out with the newest edition. Instead of being a full sequel, it turns out to be Modern Warfare 2.5 instead of 3. Battlefield 3 has seen a vast array of improvements since both Bad Company 2 AND Battlefield 2. With new additions such as a prone option and updates to their class system and already amazing multiplayer, Battlefield 3 has looked to make improvements with each game instead of copy and pasting their features every year.

The next big point to touch on is the graphics and animations in Battlefield 3 compared to Modern Warfare 3. If you are to compare the two side by side, Battlefield 3 does look better both graphics wise even running at half the frames per second in a slightly lower resolution and in the animations department. From reloading your weapon in a half and full state to vaulting obstacles, going prone and crawling the animations are full and smooth with everything having that small added touch to detail due to the power of the Frostbite 2 engine. Modern Warfare 3′s graphics do not seem to have improved much at all over Modern Warfare 2. Things do seem slightly more polished but there is only so much you can do with an engine that was used for the past 3 Call of Duty games. If it’s not broke don’t fix it right? (Or improve it.)

My third and final point is the story in the two games. While they both deal with war against the Russian army, Modern Warfare 3 continues a story that should have, and could have, ended in the second title. But Activision loves their money and saw the opportunity to make this a trilogy so they went for it. Battlefield 3 is coming into the console era with their first attempt at a single player campaign in what used to be a multiplayer only PC title. From the two videos seen so far on the single player portion of the title, it looks to give players an engaging war experience putting them in control of some intense moments. Seeing one of your squad mates shot right before your eyes and then dragging him behind cover, a man looking at a toy dinosaur from his son then being told that he will be home in time for his birthday, all of these elements can come together to make excellent story telling devices. We can look forward to depth in the characters as well as their development and possible attachment to them. In Modern Warfare 3 we can look forward to a load of explosions and adrenaline fueled moments brought on by two angry British dudes and the American Army. Oh don’t forget the high possibility of yet another cliffhanger leading into Modern Warfare 4…

I believe that both of these games will be great in their own respects to their different fan bases but Battlefield 3 is something new that shooter fans have not seen on the console. But as is how the world goes, fans of Battlefield 2 that still play it on the PC as well as fans of the upcoming game will always argue that their game is better than the other, as fans of Call of Duty will always argue that theirs is better. But I will leave you with this: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was the beginning of Call of Duty’s rise to fame when it released in 2007. Battlefield 2 held the title of best Modern Shooter before that in 2005 for 2 years and still holds popularity and is still widely played by fans without having to put out a new title every year. "

This post was edited by Patryk1991 on Aug 9 2011 09:21pm
Member
Posts: 40,007
Joined: Feb 24 2007
Gold: 11,605.43
Aug 10 2011 12:50am
Quote (Patryk1991 @ Aug 9 2011 11:21pm)
"With October 25 fast approaching, I have come up with a number of reasons as to why Battlefield 3 will be the best shooter to come out this year, especially over Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. Before anyone starts screaming “fanboy” and “paid by DICE” know that I am a huge fan of both games but I just see more potential in Battlefield than in the Call of Duty series as a whole. So here goes my point of view as to why I believe Battlefield 3 will be the best shooter we will see this year.

My first, and biggest, reason that Battlefield 3 will shut out the competition this year is that since it doesn’t see an annual release, the developers have had time to put care into every single aspect of their game ranging from animations to content. With Call of Duty games seeing a yearly release, its hard for the devs to come up with very many new ideas before they come out with the newest edition. Instead of being a full sequel, it turns out to be Modern Warfare 2.5 instead of 3. Battlefield 3 has seen a vast array of improvements since both Bad Company 2 AND Battlefield 2. With new additions such as a prone option and updates to their class system and already amazing multiplayer, Battlefield 3 has looked to make improvements with each game instead of copy and pasting their features every year.

The next big point to touch on is the graphics and animations in Battlefield 3 compared to Modern Warfare 3. If you are to compare the two side by side, Battlefield 3 does look better both graphics wise even running at half the frames per second in a slightly lower resolution and in the animations department. From reloading your weapon in a half and full state to vaulting obstacles, going prone and crawling the animations are full and smooth with everything having that small added touch to detail due to the power of the Frostbite 2 engine. Modern Warfare 3′s graphics do not seem to have improved much at all over Modern Warfare 2. Things do seem slightly more polished but there is only so much you can do with an engine that was used for the past 3 Call of Duty games. If it’s not broke don’t fix it right? (Or improve it.)

My third and final point is the story in the two games. While they both deal with war against the Russian army, Modern Warfare 3 continues a story that should have, and could have, ended in the second title. But Activision loves their money and saw the opportunity to make this a trilogy so they went for it. Battlefield 3 is coming into the console era with their first attempt at a single player campaign in what used to be a multiplayer only PC title. From the two videos seen so far on the single player portion of the title, it looks to give players an engaging war experience putting them in control of some intense moments. Seeing one of your squad mates shot right before your eyes and then dragging him behind cover, a man looking at a toy dinosaur from his son then being told that he will be home in time for his birthday, all of these elements can come together to make excellent story telling devices. We can look forward to depth in the characters as well as their development and possible attachment to them. In Modern Warfare 3 we can look forward to a load of explosions and adrenaline fueled moments brought on by two angry British dudes and the American Army. Oh don’t forget the high possibility of yet another cliffhanger leading into Modern Warfare 4…

I believe that both of these games will be great in their own respects to their different fan bases but Battlefield 3 is something new that shooter fans have not seen on the console. But as is how the world goes, fans of Battlefield 2 that still play it on the PC as well as fans of the upcoming game will always argue that their game is better than the other, as fans of Call of Duty will always argue that theirs is better. But I will leave you with this: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was the beginning of Call of Duty’s rise to fame when it released in 2007. Battlefield 2 held the title of best Modern Shooter before that in 2005 for 2 years and still holds popularity and is still widely played by fans without having to put out a new title every year. "


good review of the game, i'm so excited to play it when it comes out.

i hope they reset everyones rank after beta though, or no rankings at all. makes it fair for everyone that didn't buy medal of honor
Member
Posts: 40,007
Joined: Feb 24 2007
Gold: 11,605.43
Aug 11 2011 12:14pm
Member
Posts: 5,796
Joined: Feb 24 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 11 2011 08:44pm
can't wait for the beta on xbox!!
Go Back To Battlefield Series Topic List
Prev12345415Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll