Quote (ADDreen @ Sep 3 2024 03:21am)
the way i see, if you want to purchase more stash space, it's because they made a good game and you would actually want to reward the devs. if u think it's trash after playing it for a season, you would just stop playing and commit $0.
vs. u need to commit $70 to even try D4, for such a barebones experience a year after launch.
to "reward" someone for a product indicates you made a conscious choice to give them something they want when you dont have to. if you have to, its called a trade. anything in between is called coercion

this is exactly why the "free to play" business model is so insidious, people feel the need to defend it like it was a choice for a player to give ggg money, when in reality it isnt. if you want to play poe, you
have to pay for it. there is no choice, this isnt about cosmetic transactions. you cant keep items, you can hardly even trade items. as
said, poe free to try and thats where it ends
now if ggg was fair about it, it would be a trade. but them calling poe free is the same as vaxlords calling the vax optional and then locking you up and taking away your ability to trade until you took it. and i still didnt take it

fun fact: "free to play" is basically the good old "freemium" business model thats been around for 40 years, just for video games specifically. but no one defends freemium even though its literally the same thing. my guess as to why is because a freemium program publisher explicitly says that you cant have some features of the program, while video game publishers dont. even though that is again literally the same thing, a freemium program will give you lets say 10 usages instead of infinite and poe will give you 4 stash tabs instead of infinite. and you can fuck yourself with limited usage in both cases. now whats not the same thing is that in the old freemium you can get infinite uses for a price, but in poe you cant get infinite tabs unless you have infinite money. so its just freemium, but worse. seriously how can you defend this
