Quote (Returner @ Mar 24 2023 09:13am)
To be entirely honest, having played World of Warcraft where a similar system is in place, I'm a bit torn.
The idea that the game will be much cleaner and will not attract botters that will develop and end-game type of market within days of a new season seems pretty reasonable.
Althought we, the jsp users, are habituated, the fact that each season the D2R market is destroyed within a day or two rendering new players impossible to trade, is a reality and pretty problematic.
World of Warcraft has a similar set-up and it works well. It's also a smart way of identifying who is good at the game and should be recruited in a 4p party for high dungeons and who bought all their gear for 20$ off sites.
I'm carefully optimistic. I agree with the the fact that trading keeps the game alive, simultaneously this has proved to be like opening a can of worms with all the associated problems.
you are mixing a couple of things.
1st there is a small group of autistic narcissists' with either no job, efficient friends or just extreme good skills, that want to have their name presented on a ladder. This group hates trading because their competitors can achieve the same position with other variables (money and or trading skills). Easy solution: give them their own ladder, the "No-trade-lookatme-ladder"
2nd bots as we see in POE (no product price, no risk) and d2r (no interest from Blizz because of undeveloped game) will not happen in D4. Catching bots is just a money maker for blizz resulting in 2.1 million US$ a week with the current game price of 70$ so hopefully the price stays that high or even higher.
3rd after closing the AH and trading on D3, 98.4% of the players quit. So Trading is something that the silent majority of Diablo buyers want.