Did U Quit Yet? - Topic

Member

Posts: 5,402

Joined: Apr 2 2009

Gold: 0.00

Jan 29 2012 01:28pm

I'm still playing and enjoying the game. Unfortunately I get from 10-25 fps max. Sometimes even less..it can get a little rough sometimes..but I've had this computer for a while now and I'm kind of used to it.

HOWEVER I'm literally five minutes from filing my taxes and I'll be buying a nice new computer =] With three screens this time...I can't wait haha

Caedus

Member

Posts: 48,261

Joined: Aug 1 2008

Gold: 1,819.09

#272

Jan 29 2012 03:33pm

Quote (GEZodiac @ Jan 29 2012 01:28pm)

..... unreal engine was made in 1998.

Unreal engine 3 was first seen in gears of war (2006). So... good job there didn't even research it at all.

And if you think that 1-2-3 are the same... then you know nothing of engines.

You really like to prove that you don't lnow how to read.

They started working on the U3 enginge then, but it wasn't even close to workable untill the early 2000s when they started giving it to companies.

And I'd like to find where I said all the engines were the same dumbass. I said theres diffrent versions of a single engine, because games that use the U3 engine now are usually one made for todays games not the one from the early 00s when companies first started to license it. Just like Bioware isn't using the hero enginge that was first made (The company that made it doesn't even operate it anymore), they're using the latest version, from 2011, that they heavily modified.

GEZodiac

Member

Posts: 28,150

Joined: Aug 23 2007

Gold: 1,100.00

#273

Jan 29 2012 04:09pm

You really prove that you make false claims and use fake information.

The preliminary unreal engine 3 was showcased is 2004 and had been in development since the middle of 2002. The FIRST game to use UNREAL ENGINE 3 was GEARS OF WAR (2006).

And beyond all this, why is an "older" engine far better, in terms of graphical capability and the robust strength of the engine.

And you seem to be drawn to the game developers altering the engine for their needs, oh goodie something you somewhat know about unlike everything else, but then completely ignore everything involving the process. So win/fail.

Bioware failed with hero engine, and that it is taking 30% of their revenues is laughable. UE3 is the better engine all around, and doesn't feast on profits.

This post was edited by GEZodiac on Jan 29 2012 04:14pm

Xeonics

Member

Posts: 4,134

Joined: Jul 2 2008

Gold: 0.00

#274

Jan 29 2012 04:38pm

Quote (Caedus @ Jan 29 2012 01:13pm)

Are you that naive or just thinking people are too stupid to realize how wrong you are?

The company that developed the engine intended it for 3rd party usage. The first "game" made for it was to show off the engine. Bioware had intended to use it from the beginning, and the version they use is almost brand new. Only one other game was made from it, and that was last year. If you think companies all make their own engine you're an idiot and incredibly naive. Unreal Engine 3 is used by hundreds of games (And great games at that), and it was created in the early 2000s. You think every game that uses it used the first version? No, they don't, they use the newest one.

People bitch about the dumbest things, especially this little boy known as Xeonics.

Hero's Journey was never to just "show off" the engine. It was to be a fully developed MMO that was built around the use of the Hero Engine so it could be fully used with little to no issues. SWTOR was not designed around the limitations of the Hero Engine, which is why Bioware uses a heavily modified version of the engine; which is why it suffers from so many issues.

You're wrong, get over it.

Caedus

Member

Posts: 48,261

Joined: Aug 1 2008

Gold: 1,819.09

#275

Jan 29 2012 05:17pm

Zodiac likes his title of hypocrite I see. Tells people they're making things up then makes up everything himself? 30% of revenues going to another company? :rofl:

Thats so wrong its not even funny, actually its hilarious :lol:

All revenues on this game are going to EA amd Bioware.

Quote (Xeonics @ Jan 29 2012 05:38pm)

The company designed it as a show off a sell engine. The game is one of the smoothest running MMOs 6 weeks into release and every industry professional and expert will tell people that. You don't know anything and its hilarious to see what you're going to come up with in your failed attempts to bash the game.

This post was edited by Caedus on Jan 29 2012 05:18pm

Xuven

Member

Posts: 8,150

Joined: Jun 2 2007

Gold: 9.96

#276

Jan 29 2012 10:45pm

Quote (GEZodiac @ Jan 27 2012 01:38pm)

How did that 3m credits selling go? Your precious fg has not moved. Apparently my economics 101 was correct!

Caeus
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 1 2008
Posts: 35,086 (27.6 per day)

GEZodiac
Group: Members
Joined: Aug 24 2007
Posts: 22,401 (13.9 per day)

:rolleyes:

And I did not know punctuation mattered on an internet subforum... I will remember that for the next time I give a fuck.

Keep posting useless things.

Gotta keep upping that post count.

:rolleyes:

Screen size has nothing to do with the quality of screen shots.

But web hosting does, but the game still looks sub par for q4 2011, if high resolution textures was not removed before release they would at least be "adequate."

My statistics are not false, on a short poll lasting 2 hours on the very swtor forums the game got about a 55% for what players liked in the game vs what they disliked.

Server loads have been on the decline, even after the 1 month free cutoff.

And this poll is still accurate, as you may see by actually reading people have come is saying the opposite of what you said. They voted NO but since they they have quit.

So good try.

:rolleyes:

There is no way for you to get 100% accurate information, so it is not accurate, because some people are playing and voted their levels, some quit since, some started playing again. You're not going to get accurate information from a poll that has so many variables. So good try.

If you honestly didn't expect the server loads to decline, you have one too many extra chromosomes.

You are wrong, you have extremely poor debating skills and clearly a lack of common sense as well. Go back to college :> Waste another $1300, please.

DankWeed

Member

Posts: 7,645

Joined: Jul 9 2009

Gold: 931.20

#277

Jan 29 2012 11:38pm

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=60666182&f=166

Xuven

Member

Posts: 8,150

Joined: Jun 2 2007