d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Golf > Anchored Putting-banned > Effective 2016
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 12,774
Joined: Apr 23 2012
Gold: 155.00
May 21 2013 08:54am
http://www.pga.com/news/industry-news/usga-and-ra-adopt-rule-ban-anchored-putting-stroke-in-2016

Quote
By Doug Ferguson
Associated Press

Series: Industry News Golf's governing bodies approved a rule Tuesday that outlaws the putting stroke used by four of the last six major champions, a move opposed by two major golf organizations that contend long putters are not hurting the game.

The Royal & Ancient Golf Club and U.S. Golf Association said Rule 14-1b will take effect in 2016.

"We recognize this has been a divisive issue, but after thorough consideration, we remain convinced that this is the right decision for golf," said R&A Chief Executive Peter Dawson.

The new rule does not ban the long putters, only the way they commonly are used. Golfers no longer will be able to anchor the club against their bodies to create the effect of a hinge. Masters champion Adam Scott used a long putter he pressed against his chest. British Open champion Ernie Els and U.S. Open champion Webb Simpson used a belly putter, as did Keegan Bradley in the 2011 PGA Championship.

"We strongly believe that this rule is for the betterment of the game," said USGA President Glen Nager. "Rule 14-1b protects one of the important challenges in the game -- the free swing of the entire club."

The announcement followed six months of contentious debate, and it might not be over.

The next step is for the PGA Tour to follow the new rule or decide to establish its own condition of competition that would allow players to anchor the long putters. PGA Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem said in February the USGA and R&A would be "making a mistake" to adopt the rule, though he also has stressed the importance of golf playing under one set of rules.

"I think it's really important that the PGA Tour -- and all the professional tours -- continue to follow one set of rules," USGA Executive Director Mike Davis said. "We have gotten very positive feedback from the tours around the world saying that they like one set of rules, they like the R&A and USGA governing those. So if there was some type of schism, we don't think that would be good for golf.

"And we are doing what we think is right for the long-term benefit of the game for all golfers, and we just can't write them for one group of elite players."

The tour said in a statement it would consult with its Player Advisory Council and policy board to determine "whether various provisions of Rule 14-1b will be implemented in our competitions, and if so, examine the process for implementation."

PGA of America President Ted Bishop, who had some of the sharpest comments over the last few months, also said his group would discuss the new rule -- and confer with the PGA Tour -- before deciding how to proceed.

"We are disappointed with this outcome," Bishop said. "As we have said publicly and repeatedly during the comment period, we do not believe 14-1b is in the best interest of recreational golfers and we are concerned about the negative impact it may have on both the enjoyment and growth of the game."

Some forms of anchoring have been around at least 40 years, and old photographs suggest it has been used even longer. It wasn't until after Bradley became the first major champion to use a belly putter that the USGA and R&A said it would take a new look at the putting style.

"It can never be too late to do the right thing," Nager said.

Those in favor of anchored putting argued that none of the top 20 players in the PGA Tour's most reliable putting statistic used a long putter, and if it was such an advantage, why wasn't everyone using it?

"Intentionally securing one end of the club against the body, and creating a point of physical attachment around which the club is swung, is a substantial departure from that traditional free swing," Nager said. "Anchoring creates potential advantages, such as making the stroke simpler and more repeatable, restricting the movement and rotation of the hands, arms and clubface, creating a fixed pivot point, and creating extra support and stability that may diminish the effects of nerves and pressure."

The governing bodies announced the proposed rule on Nov. 28, even though they had no data to show an advantage. What concerned them more was a spike in usage on the PGA Tour, more junior golfers using the long putters and comments from instructors that it was a better way to putt. There was concern the conventional putter would become obsolete over time.

The purpose of the new rule was simply to define what a putting stroke should be.

"The playing rules are not based on statistical studies," Nager said. "They are based on judgments that define the game and its intended challenge. One of those challenges is to control the entire club, and anchoring alters that challenge."

The topic was so sensitive that the USGA and R&A allowed for a 90-day comment period, an unprecedented move for the groups that set the rules of golf. The USGA said about 2,200 people offered feedback through its website, while the R&A said it had about 450 people from 17 countries go through its website.

Among those who spoke in favor of the ban were Tiger Woods, Brandt Snedeker and Steve Stricker.

"I've always felt that in golf you should have to swing the club, control your nerves and swing all 14 clubs, not just 13," Woods said Monday.

Tim Clark and Carl Pettersson have used the long putter as long as they have been on the PGA Tour. Scott switched to the broom-handle putter only in 2011, and he began contending in majors for the first time -- tied for third in 2011 Masters, runner-up at the 2012 British Open, his first major victory in the Masters last month.

"It was inevitable that big tournaments would be won with this equipment because these are the best players in the world, and they practice thousands of hours," Scott said after winning the Masters. "They are going to get good with whatever they are using."

It was Clark's dignified speech to a players-only meeting -- with Davis from the USGA in the room -- that helped sway the tour's opinion to oppose the ban.

Davis and Dawson said their research indicated the opposition to the new rule was mainly in America. The European Tour and other tours around the world all backed the ban.

Players can still use the putter, but it would have to be held away from the body to allow free swing. Mark Newell, head of the USGA's rules committee, said the rule would be enforced like so many others in golf -- players would have to call the penalty on themselves.


This post was edited by iRTB on May 21 2013 08:55am
Member
Posts: 26,417
Joined: Apr 20 2007
Gold: 1,550.01
May 21 2013 11:26am
I'm kind if glad, they look so weird
Member
Posts: 51,682
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 0.90
May 21 2013 12:22pm
So it's official. I am impartial, I never used an anchored putter, and I don't believe it helps enough to warrant a ban. I don't really care either way
Member
Posts: 12,774
Joined: Apr 23 2012
Gold: 155.00
May 21 2013 01:44pm
I can see how it might be able to help but i have never personally ever even tried it....I think it's a good thing that it's gone...but not until 2016 lol
Member
Posts: 51,682
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 0.90
May 21 2013 01:52pm
Quote (iRTB @ 21 May 2013 14:44)
I can see how it might be able to help but i have never personally ever even tried it....I think it's a good thing that it's gone...but not until 2016 lol


I doubt it helps that much, I think it's all due to appearance
Member
Posts: 12,774
Joined: Apr 23 2012
Gold: 155.00
May 21 2013 01:54pm
Quote (Meatstick @ May 21 2013 02:52pm)
I doubt it helps that much, I think it's all due to appearance


I wish I had that type of putter so I could play a couple of rounds with it to see....but ya if it made a significant difference it would have been banned a long time ago...

It seems to be one of those "what if" situations...like "what if" adam scott didn't have it anchored..would he have won etc.
Member
Posts: 55,455
Joined: May 14 2008
Gold: 1,247.73
May 22 2013 12:30am
Quote (Meatstick @ May 21 2013 02:22pm)
So it's official. I am impartial, I never used an anchored putter, and I don't believe it helps enough to warrant a ban. I don't really care either way


Quote (Meatstick @ May 21 2013 03:52pm)
I doubt it helps that much, I think it's all due to appearance


Quote (iRTB @ May 21 2013 03:54pm)
I wish I had that type of putter so I could play a couple of rounds with it to see....but ya if it made a significant difference it would have been banned a long time ago...

It seems to be one of those "what if" situations...like "what if" adam scott didn't have it anchored..would he have won etc.


it is anchored. it is not a swing in the technical terms of the rules of golf. ppl began using belly putters, in which the butt of the putter was anchored to the stomach, however the arms still swung the club freely. the anchored putter actually attached the putter to the body with one hand, allowing you to use your body to steady your hands, in effect, removing the "yips" or nerves totally from putting. its like if u could attach a driver directly to your chest, forcing your shoulders to be square to the ball when u make contact. same situation, it is no longer a swing because it is attached.

they are a GREAT advantage for someone who has trouble with putting or their nerves. if the pga doesnt follow this, then they are just another example of why ppl look down on america. they think their way is better, even if by definition it is wrong, simply because it is what they WANT to do.

i have never, will never, use an anchored putter. I am a horrible putter and have horrible nerves. but i want to play the game the way the rules intended. by SWINGING the club.
Member
Posts: 12,774
Joined: Apr 23 2012
Gold: 155.00
May 22 2013 07:28am
Quote (n9neballking @ May 22 2013 01:30am)
it is anchored. it is not a swing in the technical terms of the rules of golf. ppl began using belly putters, in which the butt of the putter was anchored to the stomach, however the arms still swung the club freely. the anchored putter actually attached the putter to the body with one hand, allowing you to use your body to steady your hands, in effect, removing the "yips" or nerves totally from putting. its like if u could attach a driver directly to your chest, forcing your shoulders to be square to the ball when u make contact. same situation, it is no longer a swing because it is attached.

they are a GREAT advantage for someone who has trouble with putting or their nerves. if the pga doesnt follow this, then they are just another example of why ppl look down on america. they think their way is better, even if by definition it is wrong, simply because it is what they WANT to do.

i have never, will never, use an anchored putter. I am a horrible putter and have horrible nerves. but i want to play the game the way the rules intended. by SWINGING the club.


I wouldn't say great advantage or else more anchored golfers would be winning....you still have to line it up accurately...and pull back and return in the direction you have lined up...

no reason to bring in things like "another example of why ppl look down on america"
Member
Posts: 51,682
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 0.90
May 22 2013 09:58am
Quote (iRTB @ 22 May 2013 08:28)
I wouldn't say great advantage or else more anchored golfers would be winning....you still have to line it up accurately...and pull back and return in the direction you have lined up...

no reason to bring in things like "another example of why ppl look down on america"


Yeah, that guy is clearly over-exaggerating. Realistically having an anchored putter does nothing to help you get the putter square at contact, nor does it help with speed.

The amount of golfers winning with anchored putter on the PGA is not getting out of control whatsoever. I see nothing wrong with it, but if they want to ban it then that's fine, I use a 33'' putter anyway

This post was edited by Meatstick on May 22 2013 09:59am
Member
Posts: 55,455
Joined: May 14 2008
Gold: 1,247.73
May 22 2013 11:50am
Quote (iRTB @ May 22 2013 09:28am)
I wouldn't say great advantage or else more anchored golfers would be winning....you still have to line it up accurately...and pull back and return in the direction you have lined up...

no reason to bring in things like "another example of why ppl look down on america"


thats the thing, you dont "pull it back", you keep it anchored to your chest, keep your lead arm locked, and simply turn your shoulders. you're not pushing or pulling or swing anything, you are simply turning your shoulders.

Quote (Meatstick @ May 22 2013 11:58am)
Yeah, that guy is clearly over-exaggerating. Realistically having an anchored putter does nothing to help you get the putter square at contact, nor does it help with speed.

The amount of golfers winning with anchored putter on the PGA is not getting out of control whatsoever. I see nothing wrong with it, but if they want to ban it then that's fine, I use a 33'' putter anyway


and anchored putters have won 4 of the last 6 majors, i believe. when nerves are at the highest. how many other tournaments have those guys won? not a lot. but in majors, the advantage of calming your hands over stressful putts is a huge advantage. in other events, the other golfers are not as nervous/stressed over a putt as compared to a major, so their putting is not as far behind the anchored so the advantage is minimal in those situations.


the arguement isnt whether it is an advantage tho. the arguement and why they are banned is because it is not a SWING and thus not in the rules of golf. all the crying and complaining is just ppl who like the easier road, or who have found that the only way they can putt effectively is by anchoring.
Go Back To Golf Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll