Quote (MeatStick101 @ Apr 4 2013 08:23pm)
Some people would argue Gretzky, B Jackson, Michael Jordan, etc etc.
Some other people would argue that Tiger is not even the most dominant player in golf history, yet.
You can only judge a player by who they play against.
Tiger Woods is HANDS DOWN the most dominant player in his era and there is NO argument.
Its hard to judge Tiger vs Jack just like it's hard to Kobe or Lebron vs Jordan.
Quote (CENSOR @ Apr 5 2013 02:35pm)
This.
Just because the longevity in golf is a lot longer than most other sports, doesn't mean that one person isn't the most dominant person in sports at one time. Tiger sounds impressive, sure, he has what? 15 + years in his career? People easily forget how ridiculously impressive and dominating those above people were in their respective eras.
Although... golf is MUCH more popular today than it was when Jack played. With so many more people playing golf I think the talent pool is much larger and therefore, Tiger is playing against a higher level of competition. This makes Tiger's accomplishments a little more impressive IMO
This post was edited by Kazium on Apr 5 2013 04:48pm