d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > General Help Archive > Help Please.
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 16 2011
Gold: 5.00
Warn: 40%
Jul 31 2011 06:30pm
I get suspended for saying "idiot"..
But garret http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=559373 can have multiple sigs of 2 guys having sex?
Kinda seems imbalanced.
Member
Posts: 11,166
Joined: Jul 18 2010
Gold: 344.82
Jul 31 2011 06:30pm
Please PM hapycmpr, lc3, or lajo to discuss any unfair warn/suspension you may have received.

If you feel someone else's signature is breaking the rules, PM a Members++

This post was edited by Kampy on Jul 31 2011 06:31pm
Member
Posts: 12,037
Joined: Mar 28 2009
Gold: 10,266.70
Trader: Mediator
Jul 31 2011 06:31pm
I agree, I am disturbed everytime i see it.
I'm fine with him being homosexual but does he really have to have a sig like that?
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 16 2011
Gold: 5.00
Warn: 40%
Jul 31 2011 06:33pm
Quote (Kampy @ Aug 1 2011 10:30am)
Please PM hapycmpr, lc3, or lajo to discuss any unfair warn/suspension you may have received.

If you feel someone else's signature is breaking the rules, PM a Members++


I have pmed members ++ and was told the signiture is fine, which is why i posted this, i just dont get how a site that has the most strict rules on flaming i have ever seen allows near pornographic imagery.
Member
Posts: 19,527
Joined: May 13 2006
Gold: 110.50
Jul 31 2011 06:34pm
Quote (AntiCrash @ Aug 1 2011 12:30am)
I get suspended for saying "idiot"..
But garret http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=559373 can have multiple sigs of 2 guys having sex?
Kinda seems imbalanced.


Flaming is a warnable offense, that signature no matter how disgusting it is to you is fine with him and abides by the rules. Here is my suggestion:

Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 16 2011
Gold: 5.00
Warn: 40%
Jul 31 2011 06:37pm
Quote (Dj16921 @ Aug 1 2011 10:34am)
Flaming is a warnable offense, that signature no matter how disgusting it is to you is fine with him and abides by the rules. Here is my suggestion:

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/2296/63942790.jpg


It is clearly a sexual image, regardless of if genitalia is showing.
4)No nudity, pornography, or sexually suggestive content.

This post was edited by AntiCrash on Jul 31 2011 06:38pm
Member
Posts: 7,348
Joined: May 2 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jul 31 2011 06:37pm
wat

This post was edited by xOneNintyNine on Jul 31 2011 06:38pm
Member
Posts: 19,527
Joined: May 13 2006
Gold: 110.50
Jul 31 2011 06:40pm
Quote (AntiCrash @ Aug 1 2011 12:37am)
It is clearly a sexual image, regardless of if genitalia is showing.
4)No nudity, pornography, or sexually suggestive content.


Go ahead and round up everyone and their female swimsuit model pictures then.
Member
Posts: 24,008
Joined: Nov 18 2008
Gold: 10,219.79
Jul 31 2011 06:41pm
Quote (AntiCrash @ Jul 31 2011 05:37pm)
It is clearly a sexual image, regardless of if genitalia is showing.


It's just two men laying on a bed, nothing is being shown I don't see anything sexual or wrong with it.

Sure there naked, but nothing sexual is happening, they are just laying down or sleeping?

This post was edited by Austin on Jul 31 2011 06:42pm
Member
Posts: 3,908
Joined: Jun 16 2011
Gold: 5.00
Warn: 40%
Jul 31 2011 06:41pm
No nudity, pornography, or sexually suggestive content.
This is two men in the missionary position completely naked and kissing, how is this not sexually suggestive?
Quote (Austin @ Aug 1 2011 10:41am)
It's just two men laying on a bed, nothing is being shown I don't see anything sexual or wrong with it.


He has 2 sigs on a rotator.

This post was edited by AntiCrash on Jul 31 2011 06:41pm
Go Back To General Help Archive Topic List
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll