d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2: Resurrected > D2:R Discussion > Big Announcement To Help Everyone
Prev1234567Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,765
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 8.02
Dec 21 2021 08:11am
Quote (Zenith27 @ Dec 21 2021 09:09am)
If trump came out with a vaccine he fully endorsed, I will take it.

He’s honest, straightforward, brilliant, and a winner.

A fellow alpha male


who is vaccinated
Member
Posts: 11,782
Joined: Aug 6 2008
Gold: 5,938.00
Dec 21 2021 08:12am
Quote (Jackalkix @ 21 Dec 2021 08:32)
it has been scientifically proven that treachery is objectively better than fort

https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=54233648&f=87&o=0

only betamales think fort is better because they cant comprehend an item with a higher rune could be worse


No it has not. That link has information that is not consistent with D2R. Your merc is not going to be sitting in decrep as oblivion knights will now cast more than decrep and amp damage and baal removes decrep in between waves. The information wasn't really accurate in original D2 as there are many other situations where it is totally impossible for decrep to be cast on your merc. You might as well be citing a Christian bible as that information is just as outdated and wrong.
Member
Posts: 2,147
Joined: Oct 14 2021
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 70%
Dec 21 2021 08:14am
Quote (mki @ Dec 21 2021 09:12am)
No it has not. That link has information that is not consistent with D2R. Your merc is not going to be sitting in decrep as oblivion knights will now cast more than decrep and amp damage and baal removes decrep in between waves. The information wasn't really accurate in original D2 as there are many other situations where it is totally impossible for decrep to be cast on your merc. You might as well be citing a Christian bible as that information is just as outdated and wrong.



I know I didn’t even bother reading it. I already knew it would have holes on it, if it claims treachery is better than fort.

Fort is significantly better overall for survivability and damage. In real game use.

This post was edited by Zenith27 on Dec 21 2021 08:15am
Member
Posts: 9,923
Joined: Oct 28 2020
Gold: 3,927.64
Dec 21 2021 08:17am
Quote (Zenith27 @ Dec 21 2021 09:06am)
Unmmm I get what you are saying but politics is a way to identify who is dumb and you can make an impact by voting.

Like anyone that identify as a lib I automatically associate as being mentally inferior. Even if they are book smart, they are unable to see the big long term picture.

Scientific method???? Bro I just see the world for what it is. I’m practical and precede in my thought proceeds from what is real. Not theories and fake science with tons of holes in it.


Politics is a way for you to pick a team. Social studies have shown that Republicans, who I guess you identify as, have a deep desire for a sense of belonging. They want so bad to be a part of that team. Like you for example: you even said you understood what I was saying, and then immediately dismissed it because your team doesn't like science. It kind of negates all the bullshit the republican party spews.

Would love to have an intelligent discussion about it but I think your beta genes are just making it too difficult for you to understand intellect from a true alpha.

Anyways, fort is the superior choice
Member
Posts: 1,115
Joined: Nov 22 2018
Gold: 86.38
Warn: 10%
Dec 21 2021 08:19am
Quote (Zenith27 @ Dec 21 2021 09:14am)
I know I didn’t even bother reading it. I already knew it would have holes on it, if it claims treachery is better than fort.

Fort is significantly better overall for survivability and damage. In real game use.


Changs are supposed to be good at this game. Stop being such a disappointment.
Member
Posts: 11,782
Joined: Aug 6 2008
Gold: 5,938.00
Dec 21 2021 08:20am
Quote (Zenith27 @ 21 Dec 2021 09:14)
I know I didn’t even bother reading it. I already knew it would have holes on it, if it claims treachery is better than fort.

Fort is significantly better overall for survivability and damage.


It assumes that decrepify will be cast on your merc and that your merc will have decrepify on it for the full duration every time. The analysis then actually suggests there is a big damage improvement if this happens multiple times back to back, when in fact it's not a common occurrence to happen a single time because the curse will usually be overwritten by a different one.
Member
Posts: 8,496
Joined: Jun 14 2018
Gold: 29,402.00
Dec 21 2021 08:21am
If you know how to build a merc and what bp is needed then treachery is bis and anyone with exp in d2 knows it

If you want a cave man of a merc who just pokes at stuff with no ias then Fort is the way

Both have there builds both have there uses

Any game that’s under 3-4 minutes Fort is ovb better but anything longer then that treachery >

This post was edited by Chronic957 on Dec 21 2021 08:22am
Member
Posts: 7,457
Joined: Oct 25 2016
Gold: 1,947.20
Dec 21 2021 08:21am
big rvr...dno why someone gives this multi attention.. :wallbash:
Member
Posts: 22,265
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Dec 21 2021 08:31am
Quote (Chemwrek @ Dec 21 2021 06:19am)
Changs are supposed to be good at this game. Stop being such a disappointment.


You don't seriously believe that that is his pic.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Dec 21 2021 08:31am
Member
Posts: 3,034
Joined: Mar 18 2011
Gold: 7,100.00
Dec 21 2021 08:33am
I dunno which is better, but I know fort is better for my use. Ran treachery a long time, and on lite immune Lister when solo in a full game, I had to constantly pick up and feed merc all the heal potions on ground. Recently upgraded to fortitude, and heal potions no longer required, and he kills him faster. Mostly due to being stunned less I believe.
Go Back To D2:R Discussion Topic List
Prev1234567Next
Closed New Topic New Poll