imagine being a 2021 with 10% warn. who even trades with you.

Diablo is different because he does heavy fire damage so treachery can be useful. But fort overall is better if you tele in a huge mob or just normally run around and kill stuff, your merc gonna live a lot more over treachery.


Test this out, run chaos run and Baal (with 8 players in game) 20 times back to back and each time your merc dies keep track. I bet your merc out of those 20 chaos/Baal run will die a lot less than a merc carrying fort.

This post was edited by Zenith27 on Dec 21 2021 07:40am

Sounds objective and definitely not anecdotal

You are 100% a lib. I bet you say “follow the science”.

People with low iq that can’t see the world for what it is, and follow fake science that has holes in it always say dumb shit like you LOl

Lol.

As a goldbarb with a couple 100+ runs of travincal I can also vouch for fort. Hits harder, dies less.

I agree only beta males would equip treachery on their merc.

Fort = real man armor

I heard that in d2r, treachery had some bug which fade only procures once in a game.

If that condition is true, then it is inferior to fortitude.

This post was edited by Malignanttumor666 on Dec 21 2021 07:54am

Facts.

Only time treachery is good is when you are new and don’t wanna spent the money for fort, but once you can afford fort, it’s quite superior.

You laghing at your own jokes now Zenith?

I dunno if true or not but all I know is in real game
Play, merc with fort dies a lot less against the biggest mobs in d2 with 8 players in it