d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2: Resurrected > D2:R Discussion > Ancients Jewels For Echostrike
Prev12346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 603
Joined: Jan 3 2026
Gold: 1,400.67
Warn: 10%
Mar 31 2026 06:14am
Dude, you are the physical manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and toxic af. Perhaps consistent with why you have a constant 10% warn level.

From a logical standpoint, the onus of proof typically comes from someone claiming a phenomenon exists. For instance, if someone said bigfoot exists, people would ask them to show proof that bigfoot exists, not for everyone else to prove that bigfoot does not exist.

The +%ED/+max/min bug appears to have been fixed. I have personally tested mysef, which is why I am confident there is not a single person who can prove it, and I offer 1000 fg for anyone with video that actually proves that it does exist. Also, there are other people who have proven it as well, and have posted it in the discussion, but due to people like you who spews BS that perpetuates this


Lolwut

I think your onus is showing…

OP: “Is the well known phenomena that the world is round still true?”
“No, the earth is flat”
“Show proof”
“Onus this. Onus that. Freddy Krueger plays a Shako wearing portal Barb. I just perpetuated in my pants.”

Member
Posts: 2,597
Joined: Oct 3 2021
Gold: 15,084.50
Mar 31 2026 06:18am
Lolwut

I think your onus is showing…

OP: “Is the well known phenomena that the world is round still true?”
“No, the earth is flat”
“Show proof”
“Onus this. Onus that. Freddy Krueger plays a Shako wearing portal Barb. I just perpetuated in my pants.”


OMG UR SO FUNNY AND SMART.

Also, how do u also have a 10% warning?

This post was edited by LeetThrust on Mar 31 2026 06:19am
Member
Posts: 603
Joined: Jan 3 2026
Gold: 1,400.67
Warn: 10%
Mar 31 2026 06:35am
OMG UR SO FUNNY AND SMART.

Also, how do u also have a 10% warning?


Onus.
Member
Posts: 2,597
Joined: Oct 3 2021
Gold: 15,084.50
Mar 31 2026 07:20am
Onus.


are you just continously using that word because you didn't know what it meant and had to google it?
Member
Posts: 19,072
Joined: Feb 18 2023
Gold: 14,730.79
Mar 31 2026 08:02am
Dude, you are the physical manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and toxic af. Perhaps consistent with why you have a constant 10% warn level.

From a logical standpoint, the onus of proof typically comes from someone claiming a phenomenon exists. For instance, if someone said bigfoot exists, people would ask them to show proof that bigfoot exists, not for everyone else to prove that bigfoot does not exist.

The +%ED/+max/min bug appears to have been fixed. I have personally tested mysef, which is why I am confident there is not a single person who can prove it, and I offer 1000 fg for anyone with video that actually proves that it does exist. Also, there are other people who have proven it as well, and have posted it in the discussion, but due to people like you who spews BS that perpetuates this


If I call who has (at least who had, hope he still has it) a videoproof to show that the %ed on the jewel is bug
Would you agree to do 500 fg each?
Member
Posts: 2,597
Joined: Oct 3 2021
Gold: 15,084.50
Mar 31 2026 08:16am
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

If I call ^Goomshill who has (at least who had, hope he still has it) a videoproof to show that the %ed on the jewel is bug
Would you agree to do 500 fg each?


His video that he showed actually proves that the bug does notexist.


I don't remember the exact numbers in his video, but this is what I recall he did.

He used a shield that had %ED on it. He then socketed the shield with a jewel that had both +ED% and +max dmg. If the ED%/max dmg bug still existed, then the entire ED% of the socketed item would be effectively 0. His video actually proves that the shield still effectively gave 101% ED (100% original and 1% from the jewel) as well as +1 max damage.

How do you think his video proved the existance of the %ED/max damage bug?

I actually saw video when it came out and discussed it with him. I took those findings into consideration with coming up with my conclusion that the bug has been fixed. Unlike the low iq individuals including and not limited to and who simply perpertuate things they don't understand, I actually used my brain to anaylze the findings

If someone offers 1k fg and let me know what software I would use to record my game screen, I'd be happy to provide definitive proof of this bug being fixed

This post was edited by LeetThrust on Mar 31 2026 08:27am
Member
Posts: 19,072
Joined: Feb 18 2023
Gold: 14,730.79
Mar 31 2026 08:56am
His video that he showed actually proves that the bug does notexist.


I don't remember the exact numbers in his video, but this is what I recall he did.

He used a shield that had %ED on it. He then socketed the shield with a jewel that had both +ED% and +max dmg. If the ED%/max dmg bug still existed, then the entire ED% of the socketed item would be effectively 0. His video actually proves that the shield still effectively gave 101% ED (100% original and 1% from the jewel) as well as +1 max damage.

How do you think his video proved the existance of the %ED/max damage bug?

I actually saw ^goomshill video when it came out and discussed it with him. I took those findings into consideration with coming up with my conclusion that the bug has been fixed. Unlike the low iq individuals including and not limited to ^Dolphy and ^JeremyFisher2k26 who simply perpertuate things they don't understand, I actually used my brain to anaylze the findings

If someone offers 1k fg and let me know what software I would use to record my game screen, I'd be happy to provide definitive proof of this bug being fixed


Hmmm disagree
That video shows that the jewel IS bugged
It's just not as bugged as it seems

If i remember correctly, tell me if I'm wrong or Gloomshill can tell me also, from what I remember the jewel DOES NOT bug the %ed existing on the shield

However it is bugged in the sense that the innate %ed on the jewel is bugged
The point was just to say that it is bugged but it's not gonna destroy your ars dual Mephisto if you socket it with a protector stone

Maybe i remember it badly but that's how i understood it
I'll be more than happy to be proven wrong
Member
Posts: 35,412
Joined: Mar 29 2021
Gold: 6,486.00
Mar 31 2026 09:03am
Dude, you are the physical manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect, and toxic af. Perhaps consistent with why you have a constant 10% warn level.

From a logical standpoint, the onus of proof typically comes from someone claiming a phenomenon exists. For instance, if someone said bigfoot exists, people would ask them to show proof that bigfoot exists, not for everyone else to prove that bigfoot does not exist.

The +%ED/+max/min bug appears to have been fixed. I have personally tested mysef, which is why I am confident there is not a single person who can prove it, and I offer 1000 fg for anyone with video that actually proves that it does exist. Also, there are other people who have proven it as well, and have posted it in the discussion, but due to people like you who spews BS that perpetuates this


didn't read but I assume it's another wall of text about why eschuta coh jmod is the top nova sorc build
Member
Posts: 35,412
Joined: Mar 29 2021
Gold: 6,486.00
Mar 31 2026 09:10am
read now and if someone wants to provide him with a recording I'll sponsor with 1000 fg in case the video validates his claim that the bug has been fixed. if it doesn't whoever makes the video can get all of the 1000 fg he wagered
Member
Posts: 2,597
Joined: Oct 3 2021
Gold: 15,084.50
Mar 31 2026 09:26am
Hmmm disagree
That video shows that the jewel IS bugged
It's just not as bugged as it seems

If i remember correctly, tell me if I'm wrong or Gloomshill can tell me also, from what I remember the jewel DOES NOT bug the %ed existing on the shield

However it is bugged in the sense that the innate %ed on the jewel is bugged
The point was just to say that it is bugged but it's not gonna destroy your ars dual Mephisto if you socket it with a protector stone

Maybe i remember it badly but that's how i understood it
I'll be more than happy to be proven wrong


Okay, see how does it make sense that it does not bug the existing %ed on the shield? Doesn't the fact that you have to make this "exception" already make you suspect the bug doesn't exist? Based on the letter of the law (https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=74198145), the ED/Max bug is that if you have ED% and +max and +min dmg, the ED% is completely ignored. In his example, his 100% ED from the shield WORKS. he concluded that it doesn't "completely fuck up the shield," but he inadvertently proved that the ED% works, despite the fact that it adds both min and max damage and is not a weapon. He concluded the bug as you say "is not as buggy as it seems," but the conclusion should be taken further to the bug no longer exist. Which part of the video shows that the bug still exists in any way, shape, or form?

didn't read but I assume it's another wall of text about why eschuta coh jmod is the top nova sorc build


doesn't matter if you read or didn't since your comprehension level is nonexistant

I am certainly happy to upload proof of bug not existing for 1k fg, but I'd hate to take 74% of your networth. It's like taking money from a homeless person

This post was edited by LeetThrust on Mar 31 2026 09:29am
Go Back To D2:R Discussion Topic List
Prev12346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll