Anyone that says treachery is better than an eth fort is newb.

I have tested both in pvm very thoroughly and eth fort is far superior to treachery.

Not only your merc dies a lot less, it hits a lot harder too.

So anyone that voted that treachery was better we’re just poor newbs that couldn’t afford a fort.


You are welcome.

This is a cool story, bro.

I use duress, my merc solo uber.

it has been scientifically proven that treachery is objectively better than fort

https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=54233648&f=87&o=0

only betamales think fort is better because they cant comprehend an item with a higher rune could be worse

This post was edited by Jackalkix on Dec 21 2021 07:33am

For once you're right.



Nah e-treach is shit, that low iq math doesn't apply to real gameplay.

This post was edited by Drox on Dec 21 2021 07:33am

This is some cnn research.

Fort is far superior than treachery.

This has been tested by an elite pvper / pvmer

i like how you read through entire post in 52 seconds

Post numbers, testing methods, etc. and maybe you'll be seen as a something more than a half-wit.



he's used to having things read to him on f0xnewz.

This post was edited by CrackBerryCurve on Dec 21 2021 07:35am

just try it yourself. let your merc solo diablo with either and time it. treachery not only is better for dps, its also better for tankyness

It’s meant for low iq beta males like you to fall for.

Because it has a bunch of numbers and lines and written in a way that looks semi professional doesn’t mean it’s accurate.

I bet you think Covid is killing everyone