d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Frail Ego Mod Dismantled By Chad Daddy
12313Next
Closed New Topic
Member
Posts: 4,178
Joined: Dec 20 2015
Gold: 0.69
Sep 2 2021 11:56pm
This is probably the funniest thing i've seen in awhile. This mod is so emotionally invested in seeing kaseyk lose fg he's trying to stipulate new rules on a vtpk ruleset

Current score - KaseyK - 3 , eerock - 0
Tune in now to watch the most unprofessional jsp moderator of the year:
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=85537528&f=250&o=50
Member
Posts: 37,221
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
Sep 2 2021 11:58pm
Sounds like first duel was a troll based on manipulating rules or w/e. Second duel will hopefully be a fair duel. Having dueled both parties in LLD, I would put a strong favour on KaseyK in any m/u.
Member
Posts: 4,178
Joined: Dec 20 2015
Gold: 0.69
Sep 3 2021 12:00am
Quote (Belarathon @ Sep 3 2021 01:58am)
Sounds like first duel was a troll based on manipulating rules or w/e. Second duel will hopefully be a fair duel. Having dueled both parties in LLD, I would put a strong favour on KaseyK in any m/u.


It's not even about the duel at this point. Its the precedent being set by this ego bruised mod, who is trying to stipulate "mutually agreeable rules" which aren't mutually agreed upon. Hilarious entertainment.
Member
Posts: 1,179
Joined: May 31 2020
Gold: 0.00
Sep 3 2021 12:00am
ROFL

scammer accusation posted on @kappadpride
Member
Posts: 37,221
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
Sep 3 2021 12:02am
Quote (loftyEs @ 3 Sep 2021 00:00)
It's not even about the duel at this point. Its the precedent being set by this ego bruised mod, who is trying to stipulate "mutually agreeable rules" which aren't mutually agreed upon. Hilarious entertainment.


I actually considered this point vs that one old duel wager where the duel was set, but then the one guy used bm hacks or tactics or w/e. Textbook deemed the transaction as something like "bm / gm was never stated" and therefore awarded the winnings to the bm player. Was thinking that this s/a mirrors that one in many ways and I'm interested to see how it goes haha. Wish I had the link to the s/a I'm remembering.
Member
Posts: 25,922
Joined: Jan 27 2018
Gold: 1,303.70
Sep 3 2021 12:09am
Imagine being such a shitty dueler that
You twice engage in fake terms for a duel that you open s/a on

talking about you welching bitch
Member
Posts: 4,178
Joined: Dec 20 2015
Gold: 0.69
Sep 3 2021 12:10am
Update:
Quote (eerock @ Sep 3 2021 02:07am)
I had a moment of clarity and decided to give you another chance to correct your behaviour here and try and make things right with Kappa by dueling under a set of rules put in place - you've since declined my secondary option that was presented to you.

I am going to give you until 02:00 AM CSt (53 minutes from now) to let me know if you are going to accept the terms of option two, if not - we are reverting back to the original option.


Moderator admits they were in the wrong, but can't recognize the clear dichotomy between his idea of mutually a agreeable ruleset which alters the established ruleset he's linked, and a real mutually agreeable rules, wherein the individual involved agree upon a ruleset.

Embarrasing

Current score - KaseyK 4, eerock - 0
Member
Posts: 37,221
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
Sep 3 2021 12:11am
Quote (loftyEs @ 3 Sep 2021 00:10)
Update:


Moderator admits they were in the wrong, but can't recognize the clear dichotomy between his idea of mutually a agreeable ruleset which alters the established ruleset he's linked, and a real mutually agreeable rules, wherein the individual involved agree upon a ruleset.

Embarrasing

Current score - KaseyK 4, eerock - 0


Admitting that you are wrong is something to be applauded, not ridiculed!
Member
Posts: 4,178
Joined: Dec 20 2015
Gold: 0.69
Sep 3 2021 12:12am
Quote (Belarathon @ Sep 3 2021 02:11am)
Admitting that you are wrong is something to be applauded, not ridiculed!


Agreed, the problem is he admitted he was wrong, then introduced another egregious ego-driven solution that was poorly thought out.
Member
Posts: 37,221
Joined: Oct 16 2004
Gold: 0.00
Sep 3 2021 12:19am
Quote (loftyEs @ 3 Sep 2021 00:12)
Agreed, the problem is he admitted he was wrong, then introduced another egregious ego-driven solution that was poorly thought out.


In my opinion, VT vs VT is an absolute bullshit duel which is barely above melee.

That being said, agreeing to a VT vs VT duel and then using hammers is not legit.

Although I do believe that KaseyK is a better dueler than KappaDpride in every regard; this win doesn't seem legit.

I hope that anyone can agree with the above statements. At least anyone who duels.

Not that I am anyone or have anything to say here. But it doesn't hurt to throw your 2 cents out into the void!!!

Looking forward to the rematch and I would put my own +775/15%ed mage plate enigma ON THE LINE *****THAT'S RIGHT AN ENIGMA***** if both parties wanted :]
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
12313Next
Closed New Topic