No you're not, guess who's challenging you again?

Updated Ladder:

*oM has defended the Throne*

1) oM: GGbvb (GGBVB)
2) OG: HaloKM (KM)
3) Cha-fury: cha3 (Olympia/KM)
4) Kahn: KahnHuska (Olympia/KM)
5) Her-Barbarian: DragonOfDreams (Dreams)
6) Dirtball: Devilish (Warriors)
7) KM-MONSTER: nolove4u (Olympia/KM)
8) IIBVBII: keepinithood (GGBVB)
9) dk: heavens_light (GGBVB)
10) xOMENx: yourdemise (GGBVB)
11) JudgeOfBVB: Ironskins (Warriors)
12) sOgI: sOgI (GGBVB)
13) Gun_Kata: Gators (Warriors)
14) JSong: Rugzy (GGBVB)
15) AboveTheLaw: Duv (Damage Inc.)
16) SNSD-Sunny liniscool (#1)
17) iKnD:zech21 (GGBVB)
18) Laker: Billbo (GGBVB)
19) Garnish: Garnish (Underworld)
20) Bahamut:nate321 (GGBVB) (MIA)
21) Neo_Legend: sunglicious (GGBVB) (MIA)
22) What: xDooMx (GGBVB) (MIA)
23) Drummond: young_schlum (GGBVB) (MIA)
25) Jjashik: JjAshIk (KM) (MIA)

Duels Pending:

Gun_Kata vs AboveTheLaw ~July 9 (Try dueling soon)
Laker vs Zyos ~July 9 (Try dueling soon)
Kahn vs Cha-fury ~July 12
Garnish vs iKnD ~July 12
KM-MONSTER vs Her-Barbarian~July 13
IIBVBII vs Dirtball~July 13

Finished Duels:

Her-Barbarian vs Cha-Fury ~July 9 (7:0:1 Cha-Fury)
JudgeOfBvB vs xOMENx ~July 10 (7:5 xOMENx)
Laker vs iKnD ~July 12 (7:4 iKnD)
OG vs oM ~July 11 (7:6:1 oM)
Dirtball vs KM-MONSTER ~July 7 (7:5 Dirtball)

*Ranks have been given in a random order to start this Ladder off, newly added Players will start at bottom. Pending Duels lasting longer than 3 days will be dropped by Thread Mods and challenger will get the rank of the challenged unless challeger is at fault for delay*

**Please feel free to spread the word about this Ladder to any GM friends of yours, any and all GM BvBers on West NL are welcome to join after Mod approval.**

***Please save challenges towards Barbs in Pending Duels untill after duel has taken place, that way Barbs below can challenge you and keep Ladder moving and exciting***

****Lets Keep the Flaming and spamming down guys, and respect those that come in here to post as long as they respect our rules too.****

Man, there should be some rule implemented about the winner of a challenge being allowed to challenge before the loser.

The rule I'm suggesting to implement (in this case) would be that since I beat Kris, I would be able to challenge upwards before he is able to since him challenging over me locks me into only being able to accept challenges, and not placing one of my own.

The guy 2 spots over me is pending, so I can't challenge him, but the person 1 spot above gets challenged by the guy I just beat. Essentially Kris could end up a spot above me after just losing to me and not allowing me to progress.

Does this make sense?


Currently I have dueled Keepinithood, Nate321, and NoLove4u 3-4x each.

I literally have only dueled 2 other members on this ladder, and both are my own damn guildies!

Edit: I actually dueled Tony once too, forgot about that.

This post was edited by Devilish on Jul 13 2009 11:55am

ic what you mean, would kinda be hard to keep track of that for everyone though maybe.....

but it is a good idea. should think about it

edit: maybe both members(or winner only) should post the results of the match, and the winner would have to claim his new challenge in the same post as when he posts the score. if he doesnt then the loser can claim the challenge right after.

^
i like that

This post was edited by nate321 on Jul 13 2009 12:58pm

]It's not your fault. I'd have done the same thing in your situation.

What I'm suggesting is something that will prevent this from happening in the future, and will make the ladder run a bit smoother.

Nate's suggestion, however, captures my idea entirely. I think that is the best and most just solution.

I think the winner of a match posts the results and is able to place his challenge. Then the loser confirms the results and places their challenge.

In the case that the winner is unable to challenge there should be an alloted amount if time he has to place his challenge before the loser is able to challenge above him. As little or as much as the alloted time may be, I believe that's a good solution.

This post was edited by Devilish on Jul 13 2009 01:26pm

I understand the concept of being quick with challenges, but it overall isn't "fair".

The time alloted for the winner to place his challenge doesn't have to be much, could even be less than 1 hour. Giving the winner the opportunity to advance first just makes the most sense.

For instance: I just beat you, but because you posted 40 seconds before me you're able to be one spot above me on the ladder without having beaten me.

This is actually how you got ahead of me again in the first place. Doesn't make sense.

would be more simple if the challenge was either called in the same post when the score is placed, or not at all. then the loser doesnt have to wait around to see if winner is gonna make new challenge or not. and mod's wouldnt have to pay attention and say you have to wait this long n such to make sure winner doesnt claim a challenge.

This post was edited by nate321 on Jul 13 2009 01:36pm