Quote (MajSlayer @ May 7 2012 01:52am)
hard to enforce and make calls.
also the mitigation rule is dumb. es sorcs are banned from having max res/sorb on other ladders other than svs.
i believe skibum held #1 as 105 esfb for a bit without max res or sorb?
I've done everything actually. I've been #1 with no sorb using 20/17's, no sorb with bmanas, and the last time I climbed and afk'd at like #5 I used bmanas with infernos in one of my fire setups. All were still difficult to play, but that's really probably just related to play style. A l8z bmana spammasorc would probably be pretty difficult as they do tank like 15 fbs if they don't lose mana. but they're still screwed once they lose mana because they're sitting ducks and can't tele/can't fb and will be dead / fhr'd by the time they get the mana to do anything... Which is as simple as getting cl'd by a 200fcr since they can pick you out mid tele if the frames are right... I still felt at a disadvantage on all my es sorcs.
being able to raven with es shouldn't be allowed though
3k/3k is doable with no bmanas. but it's a fail build. He'll find out once he fights someone who can namelock. that mana will be gone in 2 fbs.
also a 11k ib sorc should do
505dmg to a 400res/raven sorc. which is comparable to a 200fcr dealing 510-560 dmg to 85 res, when you take into account they can also blizz. maybe just have the max res @ 400 and force ppl to use raven to tank more.
/e nvm my 105 iber has -260 cr with 11k ib (3.5k life 85 fr).. so that would be.. 11000*.17*(100-(400-360))/100*.6= 673 dmg per ib..
or I could swap out 3x jah's for facets and hit 12.1-12.5k ib with -275 cr for 3.3k life and deal a crazy 765 dmg per hit to a raven build
This post was edited by Skibum on May 7 2012 07:16am