d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Duel For Forum Gold!
Prev1747576777898Next
Closed New Topic
Member
Posts: 16,172
Joined: Feb 3 2007
Gold: 2,000.04
Feb 5 2010 02:07pm
pm vargus for a duel

thats how "got his 10k"

he claims to be #1 hdin on d2
supposedly never been beating lollll
Member
Posts: 82,171
Joined: Aug 21 2008
Gold: 123,675.00
Feb 5 2010 02:09pm
Quote (RagingPoo @ Feb 5 2010 08:07pm)
Gm = good mannered... Right?


Iso regular or active tag, whichever.

Most of you know me, I don't welch duels and have never abused someone's trust.

I'm not going anywhere any time soon either :P

Iso duels
Member
Posts: 27,522
Joined: Dec 1 2005
Gold: 1.50
Feb 5 2010 02:10pm
Quote (RagingPoo @ Feb 5 2010 03:09pm)
Iso regular or active tag, whichever.

Most of you know me, I don't welch duels and have never abused someone's trust.

I'm not going anywhere any time soon either :P

Iso duels


tbh i don't think someone who abides by your absurd rule set should be considered "active" or have input in regards to dueling for fg
Member
Posts: 82,171
Joined: Aug 21 2008
Gold: 123,675.00
Feb 5 2010 02:13pm
Quote (Maximillian-VII @ Feb 5 2010 08:10pm)
tbh i don't think someone who abides by your absurd rule set should be considered "active" or have input in regards to dueling for fg


Those were actually rules where I attempted to add rules that clearly needed to be their, and right rules to help against those who use bad manners.

The rules never stuck tho I am working on a revised list that I am pretty sure that no one would dislike

Agreed that 2 of the rules in that set didn't make much practical sense

Also honestly those were never "my absurd rule set", was simply something I was working with.

I wanted people's opinions thank you for being logical and open-minded :rofl:

This post was edited by RagingPoo on Feb 5 2010 02:15pm
Member
Posts: 27,522
Joined: Dec 1 2005
Gold: 1.50
Feb 5 2010 02:15pm
Quote (RagingPoo @ Feb 5 2010 03:13pm)
Those were actually rules were I as attempting to help against those who use bad manners

The rules never stuck tho I am working on a revised list that I am pretty sure that no one would dislike

Agreed that 2 of the rules in that set didn't make much practical sense.


there were more than two rules in that list that were completely useless and/or just wrong
Member
Posts: 82,171
Joined: Aug 21 2008
Gold: 123,675.00
Feb 5 2010 02:17pm
Quote (Maximillian-VII @ Feb 5 2010 08:15pm)
there were more than two rules in that list that were completely useless and/or just wrong


I don't feel like getting into a debate over this...

But when I posted that set, I clearly stated that it was open to logical discussion, not "my new rule set".

Many of the rules I added in that list should have been there, clearly a few that needed to be nerfed or had some kind of revision

The only reason I posted that set was to get input on how to revise it.

Sadly I all I mostly got was one line flame posts like what you are doing now :/

This post was edited by RagingPoo on Feb 5 2010 02:17pm
Member
Posts: 5,447
Joined: Aug 28 2009
Gold: 15.00
Feb 5 2010 02:17pm
Quote (RagingPoo @ Feb 5 2010 02:17pm)
I don't feel like getting into a debate over this...

But when I posted that set, I clearly stated that it was open to discussion.

Many of the rules I added in that list should have been there, clearly a few that needed to be nerfed or had some kind of revision

The only reason I posted that set was to get input on how to revise it.

Sadly I all I mostly got was one line flame posts like what you are doing now :/


Kids enjoying disagreeing rather than trying to make some logical sense.

They have nothing to say so they just flame. Annoying
Member
Posts: 27,522
Joined: Dec 1 2005
Gold: 1.50
Feb 5 2010 02:19pm
Quote (RagingPoo @ Feb 5 2010 03:17pm)
I don't feel like getting into a debate over this...

But when I posted that set, I clearly stated that it was open to discussion.

Many of the rules I added in that list should have been there, clearly a few that needed to be nerfed or had some kind of revision

The only reason I posted that set was to get input on how to revise it.

Sadly I all I mostly got was one line flame posts like what you are doing now :/


I'm not flaming you, I'm saying you shouldn't be allowed to have input into a discussion involving dueling for fg and what is gm/bm when the set of rules you presented obviously does not coincide with what the majority of the worthwhile duelers believe to be gm/acceptable.
Member
Posts: 82,171
Joined: Aug 21 2008
Gold: 123,675.00
Feb 5 2010 02:23pm
Quote (Maximillian-VII @ Feb 5 2010 08:19pm)
I'm not flaming you, I'm saying you shouldn't be allowed to have input into a discussion involving dueling for fg and what is gm/bm when the set of rules you presented obviously does not coincide with what the majority of the worthwhile duelers believe to be gm/acceptable.


I understand that. Some people have no zons in their rule.

Let's say someone followed the rule set for this forum.

Now let's say that someone read it thoroughly, can't find a rule about this one thing.... let's just say slow gear. No rule about it.

Then he puts on like 75% slow vs a melee char and gg.

The main reason I wrote those rules was to include the things that weren't in other rule set's that I had seen,

and also attempt to add one's that I had thought of to prevent stuff like l8z 100% offscreen spam and things of that nature.

If there is something wrong with that I am sorry

Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Feb 5 2010 02:26pm
Quote (RagingPoo @ Feb 5 2010 08:09pm)
Iso regular or active tag, whichever.

Most of you know me, I don't welch duels and have never abused someone's trust.

I'm not going anywhere any time soon either :P

Iso duels


bm dueler is bm :mad:
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1747576777898Next
Closed New Topic