d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Legit 1v1 World Ladder Escnl > Yes
Prev15065075085095101447Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 20,719
Joined: Apr 21 2008
Gold: 50.00
Apr 8 2012 03:07pm
Quote (Habakkuk22 @ Apr 8 2012 03:06pm)
18. AngryDiana (Bow&Fury) vs. 16. NewOneYea(Es Blizz)

I defended 5-2, gds


http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g420/Habakkuk222/d2jsp/Screenshot001.jpg
http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g420/Habakkuk222/d2jsp/Screenshot002.jpg




Also, about vacations:

In the ZvZ thread we used to have a *Vacation Status* bracket
You could stay on vacation up to a month and rechallenge to get your spot back when you returned
As in, if you were #7 when you left, you could immediately rechallenge the current #7 when you return
and if you win, you become #7 and the old #7, including everyone under him, is bumped down one spot
If you lose, you get to restart from bottom

This worked quite well


sounds fair imo, so like, if #10 goes on vacation hes removed fro mactive ladder and placed in a "vacation" list or w-e, then when he comes back he challenges if he wins he #10 if he loses he goes back to bottom?
Member
Posts: 4,183
Joined: Dec 12 2010
Gold: 0.00
Apr 8 2012 03:16pm
Quote (Habakkuk22 @ Apr 8 2012 02:06pm)
Also, about vacations:

In the ZvZ thread we used to have a *Vacation Status* bracket
You could stay on vacation up to a month and rechallenge to get your spot back when you returned
As in, if you were #7 when you left, you could immediately rechallenge the current #7 when you return
and if you win, you become #7 and the old #7, including everyone under him, is bumped down one spot
If you lose, you get to restart from bottom

This worked quite well


That's a nice idea for a homologous ladder, but in an all-classes ladder it could also produce a situation where someone coming back from vacation is forced to challenge a hard counter build that he or she would typically try to work around, while not really changing anything about #7 challenging #3. It would look better on paper but I think it would cause more problems than it solves for this ladder.

Edit: Not that I'm participating at the moment. >_>

This post was edited by KGBJSP on Apr 8 2012 03:17pm
Member
Posts: 20,719
Joined: Apr 21 2008
Gold: 50.00
Apr 8 2012 03:24pm
Quote (KGBJSP @ Apr 8 2012 04:16pm)
That's a nice idea for a homologous ladder, but in an all-classes ladder it could also produce a situation where someone coming back from vacation is forced to challenge a hard counter build that he or she would typically try to work around, while not really changing anything about #7 challenging #3. It would look better on paper but I think it would cause more problems than it solves for this ladder.

Edit: Not that I'm participating at the moment. >_>


damn its true though, idk if anything we can make like a limit on how long u can be afk for in top 5, then after times up u can be challenged etc
Member
Posts: 4,183
Joined: Dec 12 2010
Gold: 0.00
Apr 8 2012 03:42pm
Quote (ElCubanito @ Apr 8 2012 03:24pm)
damn its true though, idk if anything we can make like a limit on how long u can be afk for in top 5, then after times up u can be challenged etc


Hmm. I'm not saying I like the idea, but what if, after a grace period, challenging around moves the challenger ahead of the person on vacation even if he or she loses the duel?

It would kinda-sorta reward people for staying active and introduce a not-too-harsh disincentive for people who go on vacation. The person on vacation could lose spots, but not too quickly based on how long duels normally take to get resolved. Those people moving ahead after a loss would still in theory be pvpers the person on vacation could beat, and if not, they'd kinda deserve the spot anyway.

Still not implying I like this idea, but if we're brainstorming...
Member
Posts: 51,932
Joined: Jan 5 2008
Gold: 5,166.00
Apr 8 2012 07:24pm
callin dodge on this guy

12. MHC_Characters / *Raw_chars / RAW_DOG(Whirl-Wind Barbarian)

challenging this guy

10. Colton01 / *Kashya / Pally (v/t)
Member
Posts: 12,712
Joined: Nov 7 2006
Gold: 1,328.00
Apr 8 2012 07:53pm
6. tt (Nec) vs. 2. Cham (Necro) Apr 5 2012 05:56pm

defended, gds





i truly need my 3 days this time as i have 2 exams and my bday in the next 3-4 days @@

/e: i also like that vacation suggestion.

This post was edited by legen on Apr 8 2012 08:13pm
Member
Posts: 102
Joined: Mar 5 2012
Gold: 11.47
Apr 8 2012 08:27pm
24. Scooops /*Scooops / ScoopsHaagenDas (vanquisher/hybrid)

vs.

23. GoHuskers /*Pelini / Elena (bow/jav/plague zon)

PM sent
Member
Posts: 8,577
Joined: Nov 3 2010
Gold: 212.00
Apr 9 2012 05:23am
8. BULL (BvC) vs. 7. Disasters (vita pnb) Apr 5 2012 02:53pm

Nulling this in light of Easter weekend (sometimes things get busy)
But everyone need to be posting updates via cell phone or w/e it may be, updating why a challenge isn't being complete
It makes you both look inactive if you do not do so

About Vacation Status:
I see your point & concern about class advantage but consider that this is after all a *World Ladder*
You would have been competing against those classes anyway climbing from bottom to top
Being able to return and reclaim your prior ranking is certainly a shortcut past redueling (the dangerous builds bellow your prior ranking)

Either way, however this is handled, we need to clean up too many vacation status players holding solid ranks
I would say, players are allowed a greyed out vacation status for 3 days and beyond 3 days you are placed into a *vacation status* bracket
Past this, I'd like to see more input on how people want it handled



_______________________________________________________________________

IF ANYONE NOTICES ANY ERROR PLEASE PM ONE OF THE UPDATERS ASAP.


Challenges in red are due, please get them done ASAP!

Rules
- Anything concerning the rules, or debate on the rules may be posted in the thread above.


CallMeMatt
ElCubanito


legen
Joe_Spy
Habakkuk22
No more updaters needed atm



Rank -- User -- Account -- Character -- Character Type

1. AmineA / *aen1ma / LOLDerskates (ele druid)

2. legen / *Amp / Cham (Necro)

3. ElCubanito / *El-Cubanito / Salsa (Wind Druid)

4. Rivals / *emo / Bleed (Trap Sin)

5. CSLking / *Bone. / Muhaha(Ele Druid)

6. iloveoov / *Paris / tt (Nec)

7. Drogba_a / *Apocalypse_99 / Disasters (vita pnb)

8. Jam / *Besh / BULL (BvC)

9. AndreaOvna / *Nordberg / KERMiT_r (BvC)

10. Colton01 / *Kashya / Pally (v/t)

11. Amphetamine1 / *Amphetamine1 / Octogenarian (Fire Claws/Shock Summoner/Shaman)

12. iwrestledabearandwon / *Spear / Casts (vita nec)

13. Doh_Gator / *Malibu / Yalu (Windy)

14. Joe_Spy / *Joth / MTL (V/T)

15. Habakkuk22 / *Habakkuk / AngryDiana (Bow&Fury)

16. Lively /*Tsquared / Famed (Ele Druid)

17. Humd /*TheFinDestroyer/ NewOneYea(Es Blizz)

18. Gelock /*Gelock / Samizdat (Hybrid Assassin

19. Delta01 /*V4. / IroniK (V/T)

20. GoHuskers /*Pelini / Elena (bow/jav/plague zon)

21. Scooops /*Scooops / ScoopsHaagenDas (vanquisher/hybrid)


_______________________________________________________________________

Current Challenges:


3. Salsa (Wind Druid) vs. 1. LOLDerskates (ele druid) Apr 5 2012 10:34pm 24 hr. ext.

9. KERMiT_r (BvC) vs. 11. Octogenarian (Fire Claws/Shock Summoner/Shaman) Apr 7 2012 12:50am

12. Casts (vita nec) vs. 10. Pally (v/t) Apr 8 2012 09:24pm

21. ScoopsHaagenDas (vanquisher/hybrid) vs. 20. Elena (bow/jav/plague zon) Apr 8 2012 10:27pm

_______________________________________________________________________

Dodges


Banned list:

_______________________________________________________________________

Big notifications so this ladder doesn't becoming so inactive/dead

Note: If both s/s's are not present in your victory post the duel will be a loss. You will have to re-challenge the user and go through all the steps. Please comply with this as it keeps the ladder a cleaner place for all gm duelers.

1) The 3 day dodge rule is strictly enforce, a dodge count will be added to the person challenged unless an extension is requested. (When posting a dodge mention it before the time to duel is over, and post a s/s of your pm to the user.
2) If you need an extension, PLEASE post that you need it so it will not be counted as a dodge.
3) If a user surpasses 2 dodges, he/she will be removed from the ladder.
4) If a user receives 2 consecutive dodges, he/she will be removed from the ladder.
5) If you are going to be on vacation for more than 2 weeks at a time, you will be removed from the ladder and will have to work your way back up.
6) If you were last seen 6 or more days ago, you will be removed from the ladder.
7) If you do not have PM access, you will be removed from the ladder.
8) If you would like to help update the ladder, please contact myself or one of the mediators/updaters.
9) Spam WILL NOT be tolerated here, pm each other if you have that big of a problem or go slam each other in a pub (Idgaf)


_______________________________________________________________________


This post was edited by Habakkuk22 on Apr 9 2012 05:37am
Member
Posts: 62,390
Joined: Dec 11 2007
Gold: 0.00
Apr 9 2012 08:22am
Quote (legen @ Apr 8 2012 09:53pm)
6. tt (Nec) vs. 2. Cham (Necro) Apr 5 2012 05:56pm

defended, gds

http://i493.photobucket.com/albums/rr292/Leg3n/Screenshot491.jpg

http://i493.photobucket.com/albums/rr292/Leg3n/Screenshot492.jpg

i truly need my 3 days this time as i have 2 exams and my bday in the next 3-4 days @@

/e: i also like that vacation suggestion.


'he scam ribval' lol alex
Member
Posts: 28,686
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 80%
Apr 9 2012 08:29am
wow smokeisdaman struggling with ladder hardcore! rofl kid can't make it past spot #6 LOL

anyways me & cubanito are planning to do our duel tonightt
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev15065075085095101447Next
Add Reply New Topic