That a point i understand...
The third Ranking was made for guys their dont wanna play vs Bt, well this one is too beafy vs enigma.
For sure, its deppend on the experience and stlyle and yes a great Telesmiter its able to slain a Bt easy, but u ever met one in Europe vs a good Bt user?
I met one only where i said: WOW!
"Do not last hit with foh" - is a rule i was thinking about a long time. The idea was that Vts havnt so "easy" vs Smiters (expactial in Rank2),
some guys charge away and foh all the time to the death and i hate it. This rule will prevent it a bit, well a good smite is able to slain a vt which got more life in smiting...

And how many people got legit btal on Europe ? Not so many... This cut a lot of potentially ppl out of tournament that, from what I see, seems maded for Bt users only (I hope this is not your intent but reading your rules it seems...)

"some guys charge away and foh all the time to the death and i hate it. This rule will prevent it a bit, well a good smite is able to slain a vt which got more life in smiting..."

That why those people get slained by tele-smite. I can understand such a rule in walk smite vs smite but I cannot understand that rule in rank 3 where tele is allowed also the rule that ban throwlock should canceled for rank 3 at least.

Im sry, but 5 of 9 use Bt here.
As i said, i make Rank 3 only for "nonBt" Smites but .... NO ONE SIGN UP!
So what i have to do sir? It isnt my fault that the Telesmites keep themselves away from this ladder, because i wrote in the first post "|||Pm me if any new rules/ suggestions should be on here|||".
If u wanted to say: "yeh they do it cuz of the rules."

It wouldnt have any problems to remove the "Do not Throwlock" rule. I should be glad about well its easier for me to kill a "Throwlocker", then some other Smitestyles.
The only reason why i ban this, because I was in the mention its much Bm in Vt vs Vt, Fb vs Fb, Sniper in generel and so on...

I hope u understand the point, me isnt that experienced in the Movement as a telesmite.
So i would place my trust in ur words and remove the "Do not Throwlock rule" if u want this, just let me know

This post was edited by nash87 on Jan 5 2012 12:29pm

If cube/invo bo is bm say no cube bo.
OR stashing. No need for another rule addressing the same shit.

One piece of stack or absorb is allowed no more than 10% no need for two separate rules once again.
(Additionally who would take the hit from using that shield in a duel?)

Why is throwlock bm? Half the duelers probably don't know how to use it obviously who ever made the rule doesn't understand it either because a simple foh lock would accomplish the exact same thing and it is not bm. It is actually smarter if they are swirlied and trying to charge away to foh them and use it as a lock/fhr animation them into a telesmite using foh not throw.

What is the point of the no finishing with foh /charge makes no sense. It's a part of the duel. You can do all you damage except 1 life with one of the three allowable skills?

Pointing out obvious flaws is hardly immature but I guess thats the only quip you have that actually makes some sense as I'm American I have to be immature.

I don't need to be farmiliar with the "Smite" scene in europe to be familiar with a weak pvper using a bad ruleset to cover up his lack of skill.

Why would I pm you something that everyone should see? What is offtopic about addressing the rules of a ladder in the ladder?

I have not read it, and will not. No need for senseless run on sentences. We get that English is not your primary but no need to show off.

I think he made his point clear, if you can't figure out what he's trying to say then you're more stupid than most people I know

Stay away from this Topic, or ill get some Medis in here!

No Need Offtopic Spam.

Rules

| Do not throwlock |

xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD gz tour

This post was edited by Sfairat on Jan 7 2012 05:35am