Quote (BustaNut @ May 15 2011 11:16am)
It was a 2 day extension. You looked at it incorrectly and re-posted incorrectly... I made the choice to void after the extension was granted because I knew I would never be on at the same time as homeboy. Up until it being voided by me, it was still valid. Pre-challenging is pre-challenging. Everyone had the same chance to react and the more active people seized that. I had to do a match with Hayz because he saw the opportunity to challenge and seized it. If the mediators would take the time to actually look at what the other ones are doing before acting accordingly, then there would be no dilemma.
i see your point.
if you had a problem with jsp_homeboy making a challenge before you voided the challenge, then honestly, you should have stated that in the post where you voided it instead of waiting.
also consider this, if you voided the challenge and it wasnt due to jsp_homeboy being completely afk, then why would u get to be the one that challenges right away? thats not fair. what you're saying is that anyone that makes a challenge, can then void that challenge at any time and then challenge up, forcing the person they previously challenged to have to take on other challenges, or challenge above if possible. for that reason i dont think anyone has ever voided a challenge that they were currently in, voids are generally given out by the mediators.
the only person you could have challenged would have been AOZ, and if you wanted to do that, then you should have posted that in your "void" post and also mentioned how you dont think jsp_homeboy should be able to challenge yet. having not done that, you were unable to challenge anyone else and ofc someone lower would challenge you.
either way, its not really an issue anymore. mammal is the one affected by this ruling in his inability to challenge jsp_homeboy. if mammal has an issue with this, then id plead for him to just allow this challenge between homeboy and AOZ to happen, and hopefully this wont happen again in the future.
Quote (HayzBaby @ May 15 2011 11:17am)
The only reason of my spot on the ladder being under I challenged the loser is because it was the lowest duel I could take. Skipping over ruthless while mammal was in a match. Knowing I'll be able to duel was the only reason I said I challenged loser regardless of void or dra was because mammal could always challenge above me regardless of me being under him.
understood, but if mammal wanted to challenge only 1 spot above him, then he should have an equal opportunity at doing that. some users liek toc hallenge specific users or climb the ladder 1 by 1 so if he had challenged only 1 above him, you would have to accept it and be open to challengers.
i made some mistakes and i apologize, but lets get past this. mammal if you have an issue with this, then lmk via pm.
all in all, theres no more pre-challenging. voids are given out by mediators only, and after the void is posted by a med, the two in the voided challenge are free to challenge or be challenged.