Yea it would be hard to mandate but its pretty obvious when someone is over stacking. Idk about other blizzers but I count how many times I hit someone -- I can tell when my blizz hits them.

I understand fbers / liters are in the situation where they take less skill ~ easier to duel with in SvS ladder... and thats the reason why I think the over stack should be diminished a bit. It makes no sense to completely nullify an element of a character because you guys think stacking 400 resist against a builds MAIN SKILL (cold mastery) is GM.

p.s. not trying to bash you with the lite/fire no skill remark... its just obvious looking @ the ladder that its the easier character to play. Obviously you are #1 for a reason.



relax man



there isn't a correct way to play a character when it comes to PvP

[edit] and I also disagree that its easier to run into blizz than fbs. Its just as likely for both if both sorcs aren't morons.

This post was edited by MyAddiction on Jan 24 2010 01:49pm

then teach me, and ill convince otheres. lol
im not getting worked up
just a lil confused on why u think blizzers suck.

blizz lasts tho, so when ppl blizz and run then repeat your bound to tele into them eventually
fb's are hard to land vs someone who knows what theyre doing, especially without wanting to stomp into a blizz

sure i can orb them to freeze them so they cant walk, but that just makes them wear a raven instead of a bk, not a huge deal imo

but aoz is right, blizz is never a good 1v1 build tbh, its made for teams/pubs where ppl cant just outstack cold mastery

personally love blizzers, especially in team pk...
the rule is the way it is because its based off 2 people of maximum skill and also the team pk/1v1 normal rules

team pk when someone is forced to duel physical and light then u throw a blizzer in there... thats alot to do... so even if the blizzer does no dmg it allows for others to do more because u cannot properly sorb all elements...HOWEVER
this isnt team pk i was just explaining where the rule came from...

i could prolly show u a few things if u want... and show u how it is somewhat fair depending on skill

pm me

yep agreed

So what you are saying a rule was made so people who were skilled couldn't win?



I disagree I've lost to almost nobody in a 1v1 duel (minus sorcs that stack 400+).

no i said the rules are made so if the best of both dueled...
best skilled blizzer vs best skilled fber it would make for gds....

i mean idk how much stack i use but i kno the blizz's that hit and the fbs i hit other with are about the same... and usually are close duels...

its one thing i dont think will change...

ofc you win when you 2-3 hit ppl and they 6-7 hit you

and it is possible to win on a blizzy, when sickt was playing around vs me on greg's b4 he sold it to try and prove it was possible they were really close duels
it was a wierd build, like 4.2k life and good frw. so even when i'd land a hit i wouldnt fhr him
it was a pain and really annoying duels from both perspectives imo, but it is possible, just fire/lite is so much more for fun for svs

also most people look at svs as namelock and stomps....and such

blizz really is more a defensive play style in svs... casting/walking/avoiding...
so its a very different thing all together imo

also the blizzer that is making most complaints takes like 8 hits to kill my es sorc w/ no stack and no sorb....

so a low dmg/cheep blizzer isnt gona be able to kill a good fber... end of story
should it be any other way? lol

This post was edited by Aoz14 on Jan 24 2010 02:05pm