d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > East Scl Zon Vs Zon > By Mew & Es_7
Prev1381382383384385514Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 23,713
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: 9,229.50
Nov 18 2009 12:05am
Quote (Prank @ Nov 18 2009 06:04am)
idk apparently im noob for using fort and everyone was sayin 160/60 > fort ect so I figured it was a bad build.. am i wrong?


fort isnt a noob build nor does it make you a bad zon.
the whole reason for this is to promote more fair zvz duels by taking one of the major luck factors out
Member
Posts: 20,726
Joined: Jan 2 2007
Gold: 94,877.84
Nov 18 2009 12:05am
Quote (Prank @ Nov 18 2009 02:04am)
idk apparently im noob for using fort and everyone was sayin 160/60 > fort ect so I figured it was a bad build.. am i wrong?


fort is a nice armor
way better than 160/60
for one i wouldnt use a 160/60 if faith was still allowed
160/60 is only used if i need the ias not for the damage

fort is amazing but for zvz its not right
also cookie cutters are garbage
Member
Posts: 48,328
Joined: Feb 14 2009
Gold: 0.36
Nov 18 2009 12:05am
I am remaking my char
Member
Posts: 16,607
Joined: Aug 23 2006
Gold: 885.02
Warn: 100%
Nov 18 2009 12:06am
Quote (Heid @ Nov 18 2009 01:05am)
fort is a nice armor
way better than 160/60
for one i wouldnt use a 160/60 if faith was still allowed
160/60 is only used if i need the ias not for the damage

fort is amazing but for zvz its not right
also cookie cutters are garbage


Vouch this ofc
Member
Posts: 3,631
Joined: May 5 2008
Gold: 1,072.00
Nov 18 2009 12:10am
lol im gonna remake too.. should be done by the end of this week hopefully
Member
Posts: 16,607
Joined: Aug 23 2006
Gold: 885.02
Warn: 100%
Nov 18 2009 12:16am
Quote (kevinpatrick @ Nov 18 2009 01:10am)
lol im gonna remake too.. should be done by the end of this week hopefully


^_^
Member
Posts: 23,713
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: 9,229.50
Nov 18 2009 12:23am
Updates:

[*]Remember the dates set are 1 hour behind CST (my board time)
[*]Please check my profile for the updated ZVZ rules! Also, the re-challenge wait limit is still 3 days... not four like the dodge rule.
[*]3 day re-challenge rule. 4 day dodge limit. After 4 days I add 1-2 days and request proof you pm'd/worked out a time.
[*]If you plan to remake your character or go on vacation, I will allow you to lock your spot for 7 days MAX.
[*]There is now a dodge rule for rank #1! If you cannot complete a ft5 in a 2 week period you will be dodged!
[*]Nos coil is banned. Rebuild if needed!


We got a full ladder now! I wanna see some duels!




Mediators


Arelax<-
Jajaboo-pO <-
LOLRagezzz<-




ZvZ Ladder

[1] Vits / irmule / irmule
[2] GMBow / Arelax / SScali
[3] Qtpatoootie / jajaboo-pO / Wytewidow
[4] PostIt / LOLRagezzz / Thetopdecker
[5] DoV-PewPew / noodlenugget / DoV-TheMetal
[6] LL / Mew / pkinginc
[7] Fluctuation / Prong / ProngPvP
[8] Flush / Prank / Prank.
[9] PiercedTits / sungil_jeon / Trueid3
[10] Cent / N3rd / BOjangles
[11] DoV-HIM / raph1137 / egi
[12] Play_Girl / deathHallow / deathHallow *Locked until Nov 23rd. Skip over while challenging.
[13] Abbigail / Kevinpatrick / Kevmac *Locked until Nov 23rd. Skip over while challenging.
[14] Restrain / hewsaccount / Detrimental.
[15] FatWench / Vampira / JFKisnotdead




Currently in challenges:

1, 2, 7, 8,





Matches:

7 vs. 8 (Ends Nov 18th)
2 vs. 1 (Ends Nov 30th) Good Luck Guys!

This post was edited by LOLRagezzz on Nov 18 2009 12:25am
Member
Posts: 16,607
Joined: Aug 23 2006
Gold: 885.02
Warn: 100%
Nov 18 2009 12:30am
I'm challenging #14 hewsaccount


pm sent
Member
Posts: 79,267
Joined: Aug 15 2007
Gold: 56,583.00
Nov 18 2009 12:39am
Quote (Prank @ Nov 18 2009 01:50am)
Ok this is how I see it.

Most everyone on the ladder should be able to afford a 160/60 lifer. Ladders are for the best not the best and some welfare characters. There should never be any arguing about what people can and cant afford.

But besides that, I don't see anything wrong with people using fort. From what I understand, it seems to be a disadvantage build in ZvZ, so if they want to have that disadvantage, and don't want to bother (meaning me) with getting a 160/60 setup, then let them. They (meaning me, again) will suffer because of it. I don't think it should be banned.

The chilling armor is annoying but not some huge advantage or anything..




Quote (Vampira @ Nov 18 2009 01:54am)
You do basically no damage



Quote (LOLRagezzz @ Nov 18 2009 02:02am)
the thing that makes CA unfair is that if your opponents CA has triggered and yours has not, theres no way to win a jav war
you can try to run and arrow but all they have to do is just keep charging on shield.
thats not very fair or fun.
and in the case both players get it it turns into a coin flip instead of who can shoot/manuver best




these
Member
Posts: 2,059
Joined: Nov 19 2003
Gold: 220.00
Nov 18 2009 03:46am
fort is really ridic when ca procs so i support the no fort/faith but then again i have an amazing rare bow but still Windforce hits like a friggin train so if people are complaining about not being able to use faith throw them a wf and theyll be happy
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1381382383384385514Next
Add Reply New Topic