Ok this is how I see it.

Most everyone on the ladder should be able to afford a 160/60 lifer. Ladders are for the best not the best and some welfare characters. There should never be any arguing about what people can and cant afford.

But besides that, I don't see anything wrong with people using fort. From what I understand, it seems to be a disadvantage build in ZvZ, so if they want to have that disadvantage, and don't want to bother (meaning me) with getting a 160/60 setup, then let them. They (meaning me, again) will suffer because of it. I don't think it should be banned.

The chilling armor is annoying but not some huge advantage or anything..

Ever dueled a zon that has chilling casted with a 160/60 zon?

It doesn't work

nop, enlighten me.

You do basically no damage

Pretty sure postit still killed me when it was casted.. and i have alot of life..

keyword is "basically"

Fort isn't real ZvZ anyways, why get used to fort on ladder, switch to NL and have to remake your zon?

lol
if i threw a 16060 on jer would 5-0 me
thats some disadvantage for him

the thing that makes CA unfair is that if your opponents CA has triggered and yours has not, theres no way to win a jav war
you can try to run and arrow but all they have to do is just keep charging on shield.
thats not very fair or fun.
and in the case both players get it it turns into a coin flip instead of who can shoot/manuver best

Switching to Nl is a myth. won't happen.

idk apparently im noob for using fort and everyone was sayin 160/60 > fort ect so I figured it was a bad build.. am i wrong?


mb double'd

This post was edited by Prank on Nov 18 2009 12:04am