d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Ghost Assassin Ladder East Soft Core Non Ladder
Prev13637383940479Next
Closed New Topic
Member
Posts: 60,343
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 20,955.00
Mar 24 2011 09:56am
Quote (mikemule31 @ Mar 24 2011 03:51pm)
i was just saying in comparision a win is a win excuses are not valid and its not just my ladder its every ones ladder but imo that rull contradicts itself as win by or first too 7 what the differ in first too 5 and first too 7 if its not gonna be win by 2.


well it does specify in particular only for: 24. "for duel against #1 spot." 5-3=auto win, first to 7 regardless if by 2 or not would b kinda fair to give a bit more chance and to prevent duels to b ongoing i.e. could b like 9-9+ etc until win by 2.

This post was edited by D0MAIN on Mar 24 2011 09:57am
Member
Posts: 36,952
Joined: Nov 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Mar 24 2011 10:00am
Quote (D0MAIN @ Mar 24 2011 03:56pm)
well it does specify in particular only for: 24. "for duel against #1 spot." 5-3=auto win, first to 7 regardless if by 2 or not would b kinda fair to give a bit more chance and to prevent duels to b ongoing i.e. could b like 9-9+ etc until win by 2.


imo it should be best of 7 then not a chance of 5-3 :P im just saying that rule is kinda off balance imo best of 7 unless 5-0 imo cause at 5-3 you can still rally 4 str8 wins you know what im trying to explain?
Member
Posts: 60,343
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 20,955.00
Mar 24 2011 10:07am
Quote (mikemule31 @ Mar 24 2011 04:00pm)
imo it should be best of 7 then not a chance of 5-3 :P im just saying that rule is kinda off balance imo best of 7 unless 5-0 imo cause at 5-3 you can still rally 4 str8 wins you know what im trying to explain?


ye i know, but this ladder is pretty skilled imo and buncha gclaw sins :ph34r: (only a few of us nongclaw 3xsins in here >.<), winning 5-3 is prrty hard (if u can do it more power to ya gg) i think considering the people involved in this ladder. but then agin it can b refuted tht since its so skilled and due to intensity of the duels first to 7 would make sense also.

idk tbh xD vote i guess :o ?

This post was edited by D0MAIN on Mar 24 2011 10:11am
Member
Posts: 36,952
Joined: Nov 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Mar 24 2011 10:12am
Quote (D0MAIN @ Mar 24 2011 04:07pm)
ye i know, but this ladder is pretty skilled imo and buncha gclaw sins :ph34r: (only a few of us nongclaw 3xsins in here >.<), winning 5-3 is prrty hard (if u can do it more power to ya gg) i think considering the people involved in this ladder. but then agin it can b refuted tht since its so skilled first to 7 would make sense also.

idk tbh xD vote i guess :o ?


maybe but i think we should all talk it over and what not.
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
Mar 24 2011 10:46am
Quote (mikemule31 @ Mar 24 2011 12:12pm)
maybe but i think we should all talk it over and what not.


well in that case... lets do a vote about rule #24

For it: Azn Masta, Decarnate, OldAndyofTheSea
Against it: acdc5

and best of 7 isnt really fair btw cuz it could be 4-3 (thats 7 duels... and its even shorter than a regular ft5)
ft7 is best cuz many often times when dueling skilled sins i often get 5-4 them and then we do a few more for fun and it goes 5-5 and then 6-5 and then 6-6 u know? the first to 7 would cut it off and prevent it from going on forever.

This post was edited by Azn Masta on Mar 24 2011 10:59am
Member
Posts: 19,257
Joined: Dec 31 2008
Gold: 7,802.00
Mar 24 2011 10:57am
Quote (mikemule31 @ Mar 24 2011 03:26pm)
imo it should be all spots not just #1 spot position should not be specialized cause its #1 cause regardless of what happens a win is a win even if you click off screen its like saying well you died first (when both men die) so its my win :P


Quote (Azn Masta @ Mar 24 2011 04:46pm)
well in that case... lets do a vote about rule #24

For it: Azn Masta, Decarnate, OldAndyofTheSea
Against it: ?

and best of 7 isnt really fair btw cuz it could be 4-3 (thats 7 duels... and its even shorter than a regular ft5)
ft7 is best cuz many often times when dueling skilled sins i often get 5-4 them and then we do a few more for fun and it goes 5-5 and then 6-5 and then 6-6 u know? the first to 7 would cut it off and prevent it from going on forever.


Hey guys,
Personally i enjoy the first to 5 rule. I mean if you loose and its 4-5, you must've had some good duels. AND you can always rechallenge,
No need to be sore complaining about "lucky claw blocks" or w/e,
If you loose it was your loss that day? YOU can always step up your game next time and do better.

The point of the ladder is for some competitive sin dueling. WE all enjoy sins and i dont think we bitch and complain about losses too much when they happen,
Leave it as is imo.
First to 5 takes the spot. If you loose even with it being 4-5, Be gracious for the close duels and re-challenge after you've tried to better your sin// evaluated your own dueling style.

Dats my vote, I think it all comes down to sportsmanship and integrity.. but what would i know?
http://raisingfigureskaters.com/tag/rudy-swiegers/
Member
Posts: 60,343
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 20,955.00
Mar 24 2011 11:03am
Quote (acdc5 @ Mar 24 2011 04:57pm)
Hey guys,
Personally i enjoy the first to 5 rule. I mean if you loose and its 4-5, you must've had some good duels. AND you can always rechallenge,
No need to be sore complaining about "lucky claw blocks" or w/e,
If you loose it was your loss that day? YOU can always step up your game next time and do better.

The point of the ladder is for some competitive sin dueling. WE all enjoy sins and i dont think we bitch and complain about losses too much when they happen,
Leave it as is imo.
First to 5 takes the spot. If you loose even with it being 4-5, Be gracious for the close duels and re-challenge after you've tried to better your sin// evaluated your own dueling style.

Dats my vote, I think it all comes down to sportsmanship and integrity.. but what would i know?
http://raisingfigureskaters.com/tag/rudy-swiegers/


agreed. i like ft5 if NOT for #1 spot.


but for rule #24, since it is for #1 spot. win by 2 aka 5-3 or first to 7 which ever comes first outta the two. id have to agree here as well.

This post was edited by D0MAIN on Mar 24 2011 11:07am
Member
Posts: 29,055
Joined: Feb 13 2005
Gold: 150.00
Mar 24 2011 11:37am
Glad to see us evolving here as a whole :)

Now if only we could get about 4+ more sins to join....
Member
Posts: 36,952
Joined: Nov 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Mar 24 2011 11:48am
Quote (Azn Masta @ Mar 24 2011 04:46pm)
well in that case... lets do a vote about rule #24

For it: Azn Masta, Decarnate, OldAndyofTheSea
Against it: acdc5

and best of 7 isnt really fair btw cuz it could be 4-3 (thats 7 duels... and its even shorter than a regular ft5)
ft7 is best cuz many often times when dueling skilled sins i often get 5-4 them and then we do a few more for fun and it goes 5-5 and then 6-5 and then 6-6 u know? the first to 7 would cut it off and prevent it from going on forever.


well what i mean is if were talking #1 spot it should be first too 7 and thats it.

Quote (D0MAIN @ Mar 24 2011 05:03pm)
agreed. i like ft5 if NOT for #1 spot.


but for rule #24, since it is for #1 spot. win by 2 aka 5-3 or first to 7 which ever comes first outta the two. id have to agree here as well.


i dont liek the you loose if its 5-3 its unfair imo first too achieve 7 wins seems best win win for both parties

This post was edited by mikemule31 on Mar 24 2011 11:49am
Member
Posts: 9,909
Joined: Jun 14 2009
Gold: 1,000.00
Mar 24 2011 11:56am
I am for it
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev13637383940479Next
Closed New Topic