Snag should be #12

Scjacker should be #11

This post was edited by BiWinning on Jul 3 2016 06:49pm

No?
You don't flip-flop places with the person you challenge you just move up in front of that person

nope, you switch spots with whoever you challenged

(if you win that is)

This post was edited by BiWinning on Jul 3 2016 06:55pm

That makes no sense IMO
And not how I've been updating since I took over

Biwinning is right, but i like ur way better continue doing what ur doin

It's not fair for the people who get bumped down a rank when they didn't lose or have anything to do with that challenge

It's the way ladders have been ran for as long as I can remember



makes perfect sense, if you lose you go down 1 or 2 ranks based on the rank of the per

This post was edited by BiWinning on Jul 3 2016 06:58pm

Sorry BiWinning I had no clue that's how it was originally done, but that makes no sense in my opinion.
Cuz if you do it that way that means if 5 challenges 3 and wins, and you flip-flop places, then you're saying that 3 is worse than 4, even though they didn't duel, basically they lose a position for nothing IMO

They don't lose a position for nothing, they lost the challenge.

In that case, #4 loses a position for nothing since he had nothing to do with the challenge between #3 and #5

The person's rank inbetween the challengers should not be effected.

This post was edited by BiWinning on Jul 3 2016 07:00pm

He's still in the same position tho, right behind the guy he was behind before the duel happened.

Pm me if you want to discuss further

This post was edited by godxsherps on Jul 3 2016 07:01pm