nothing wrong but we need more!

I'll be back next week maybe I could give it a shot

So i'm extremly bored right now and something to discuss about is this wep bm, yes and no and why?

Yes, any poison damage on a wep makes it bm.

Should explain why it's bm with that little poison dmg ~

I tested this with Jason and each time he hit me, I saw no Life loss after the initial damage and no difference from bein hit with a normal weapon other than the fact that u turn green.

While I agree poison DMg, like all elemental DMg, is generally bm in melee duels, I suggest that like the other types, a reasonable cap be set that should be determined as the minimum amount where you actually lose life after the initial blow wearing the least possible poison resistance.

Up to a certain point of DMg, other than turning green, there really is no effect on the duel.
At least for me, this is FAR less annoying than firestorm off a torch, which is both obnoxious and actually takes of life

I would also like to remind everyone that this is a suggestion thread designed to promote reasonable ideas and efforts to improve melee dueling, not a thread designe to shoot down every new idea or alteration in a rule, without any evidence or testing backing up such rejections, simply because some do not want to see any change from what they are used to. That just defeats the entire purpose of this thread and for too long I have watched reasonable discussions and ideas shot down because some people think they are on a power trip or above others in the community for whatever egotistical self endulging reasons.

Rant over.... Please discuss

And in case anyone was wondering.... I do not own any rare weapons with psi DMg. My comment is is simply an objective observation regarding a perhaps unnecessary rule, I have no financial incentive either way

just has been a major rule for a long time. People have often tried fighting it when they found a godly fools with small amount of psn dmg but was always turned down.

Case in point. What is the purpose of this thread then? Lol

you say this but offer no explanation of why it is bm. First of all im selling this axe. secondly its gm on nt ladder so if anything i would use it there. i had no intentions of using this on ugml however i still feel the rule should be reviewed, not for my personal gain but because i think its fair. Its easier for you to say "People have often tried fighting it when they found a godly fools with small amount of psn dmg but was always turned down" instead of objectively looking at the situation and asking yourself if the rule is still valid, backing it up with concrete evidence. It seems like it would be pointless to do further test because of close minded people like you who simply state "its bm and has been a major rule for a long time". whats the point of having this suggestion thread if nothing is reviewed or tested?