d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Europe Nonladder Smite Vs Smite Ladder > Designed For Smiter - V/t - T/v
Prev13132333435157Next
Add Reply New Topic
Views: 35547Replies: 1560Track Topic
Member
Posts: 9,922
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 17,502.03
#321
Mar 1 2012 03:07pm
Quote (Michuta @ 1 Mar 2012 21:51)
#02 Tw3ety (Transformers) Judgment (Smite)

challence s

#03 Michuta jol (Smite)


since he got to wait 24 h i challenge:

#02 Tw3ety (Transformers) Judgment (Smite)

challenges

#01 oldsqlfooL (Smiters) Laoh (Smite)
Member
Posts: 10,433
Joined: Dec 30 2006
Gold: 6,149.00
#322
Mar 1 2012 03:11pm
ok cleggi, play now :)

edit: where is that rule written, that he has to wait 24hours?

This post was edited by oldsqlfooL on Mar 1 2012 03:12pm
Member
Posts: 9,922
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 17,502.03
#323
Mar 1 2012 03:12pm
Quote (oldsqlfooL @ 1 Mar 2012 22:11)
ok cleggi, play now :)


vs u i used cleg yes. not vs him :D cant now sry, we can do it tomorrow evening
Member
Posts: 19,560
Joined: Nov 24 2007
Gold: 333.00
#324
Mar 1 2012 03:13pm
Quote (Tw3ety @ Mar 1 2012 10:12pm)
vs u i used cleg yes. not vs him :D cant now sry, we can do it tomorrow evening


HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Member
Posts: 10,433
Joined: Dec 30 2006
Gold: 6,149.00
#325
Mar 1 2012 03:13pm
Quote (Tw3ety @ 1 Mar 2012 22:12)
vs u i used cleg yes. not vs him :D cant now sry, we can do it tomorrow evening


sure we can play tomorrow then, but first show me where that 24h rule is written. otherwise we cannot play, since u are challenged by michuta ;)
Member
Posts: 9,922
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 17,502.03
#326
Mar 1 2012 03:15pm
Quote (oldsqlfooL @ 1 Mar 2012 22:13)
sure we can play tomorrow then, but first show me where that 24h rule is written. otherwise we cannot play, since u are challenged by michuta ;)


nash told it to me via pm. everything else would be stupid anyways since i wouldnt have any chance to challenge u
Member
Posts: 10,433
Joined: Dec 30 2006
Gold: 6,149.00
#327
Mar 1 2012 03:18pm
Quote (Tw3ety @ 1 Mar 2012 22:15)
nash told it to me via pm. everything else would be stupid anyways since i wouldnt have any chance to challenge u


sry, but i dont consider pm rules as official rules. nash should state something about this, but for now you are challenged by michuta and cannot challenge me.
Member
Posts: 9,922
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 17,502.03
#328
Mar 1 2012 03:24pm
Quote (oldsqlfooL @ 1 Mar 2012 22:18)
sry, but i dont consider pm rules as official rules. nash should state something about this, but for now you are challenged by michuta and cannot challenge me.


i should be clear that i got the privilege to challenge first since i won the duel. common sense imo
Member
Posts: 14,340
Joined: Apr 25 2008
Gold: 10,670.00
#329
Mar 1 2012 06:23pm
Quote (Tw3ety @ 1 Mar 2012 22:24)
i should be clear that i got the privilege to challenge first since i won the duel. common sense imo

I agree with that, it wouldnt make sense to let the stipulated person just 5 min time to challenge anyone, especially it is the same person who challenge Julian ^^.
Sound fine to me that Tw3ety challenged Stef first...
Its absolut fine that u are pointing me stef, that was just a part of the ruleset i've forgotten. Forgive me ^_^
Hope you guys will keep it in mind and see it as a "varnish invisble rule".
Anyway, i could edit the first post and at them, just let me know if anyone would like to see. One pm is absolut enough and i will change it,
for the next days the open challenges will look like

Open challenges

#04 Dune666 vs. #03 micho (Rank 2 / till 03.03)
#02 Tw3ety vs. #01 oldsqlfooL (Rank 1 / till 04.03)
Member
Posts: 10,433
Joined: Dec 30 2006
Gold: 6,149.00
#330
Mar 2 2012 05:20am
alright np, but please edit those rules in nash, ty ;)
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev13132333435157Next
Add Reply New Topic

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact