Sorc vs Sorc GM Ladder

~
#1 - red_man_27 / *Rush7 / WishBall / Vita Fire
#2 - Skibum / *Skibum / Courage / ESFB
#3 - B_R_A_D // *B_R_A_D // Hydrogen // Vita Fb
#4 - SitePoint/ *09_T.RoMo / Cheering / Vita Hybrid (Fire/Cold)
#5 - JohnDoeX / *MartianBuddy / LithiumFlower / Vita FB
#6 - Noeymc/Fireball/Senseless/Vita Fb
#7 - Aoz14 / aoz. / circ / vita lite
#8 - Scharf / *Scharf / Imperfection / Vita Fb
#9 - aznvico / *sunny. / Acrobats / Vita Lite
#10 - batman2 / Yermo2 / Greenline/ Vitaballer
#11 - GoHuskers / *Pelini / MangSong / vita fire
#12 - FmJz / Team. / WuW / Vita FB
#13 - irmule / *Versatile/ Meep / Vita fb
#14 - Artemisdz / *ArtDZ / Art_PewPew / Vita FB
#15 -
~

Waiting List:
Synics / Synics / Bama / ESFB
Gthyjuki/Kaelte/Kaelte/Vita FB
neekzisonfire / *neekzisonfire / Teams / esfb

Banned List:
BillRooper(ScreenSaver)-Time Frame(Unknown)

Dodge Counts:

Challenges

~

13 v 11 (Sep 3 2010 07:06pm)
10 v 8 (Sep 4 2010 09:20pm)
7 v 6 (Sep 5 2010 12:54am)
5 v 4 (Sep 6 2010 05:02pm)
~

votes are in. only 1 person voted to keep him on out of everyone
bill is banned . time limit is unknown.
all spam will now start to be pmd to a moderator for action. only post here for

challenges
results
svs gm games
any other related topics to this ladder (related)

This post was edited by SitePoint on Sep 6 2010 07:29pm

That's funny.

A few people come out supporting me, and what do you do? You ban me for things that did not take place in a ladder duel.

In the last page alone I had 2 people backing me up, yet you say only 1 person voted to keep me in? There was no formal vote to begin with anyway LOL

If anyone should be banned, it is you. You've initiated a spam storm with your posts that do not belong in this thread. Not only have you filled this thread with spam, but you've also shown that you're corrupt. You're trying to ban me because I styled on you intellectually in a game that wasn't even for the ladder.

i still feel as long as the svs ladder duels are gm no need to ban till he bms in a ladder duel sohuld be ban'd

looks as if this is a joke ladder now 2

sitepoint this isnt your castle, and your not the king... so relax

my first post in days... all i see for 3-4 pages is u and billropper or w/e
i laughed pretty hard at the verbals he gave u

if the duel wasnt for ladder, then u cant ban some1 cuz buncha randoms voted

if i got do a duel in pubs on my necro and use a juv (dotn pub duel.. but for story purpose)
do i get banned from the all class ladder?

This post was edited by Aoz14 on Sep 6 2010 08:16pm

i know? when 9 people vote yes, i believe that I'm not a king, rather a speaker of the house
had anyone else posted the results would u be on their nuts?
edit-blah spam, had t o respond tho
no more spam. already reported some

This post was edited by SitePoint on Sep 6 2010 08:12pm

Sitepoint, it looks like more and more people are speaking out against your corruption.

You can't just cite votes that you pulled out of thin air and expect people to let you get away with your corrupt actions.

We all get it, I owned the shit out of you, you're bad, and you're mad. I don't think anyone is surprised.

Your decision to ban me will surely be overturned and hopefully you'll receive some punishment to teach you a lesson.

Oh, and by the way, all of this "spam" can be attributed to you. You are the one responsible for it. You're the one who started crying about things not pertaining to ladder matches. You're the one that proceeded to ban someone because you got made to look like a fool. Any posts regarding this issue now are necessary posts to correct your wrongs. If you truly want the "spam" to end, do everyone a favor put me back in the ladder and remove yourself.

Since he admitted he was bm'ing, and the DQ before all this happened was official (is it? still not sure), that means the test that took place was not for ladder.
IMO don't ban him, just make it mandatory for him to record his ladder duels if someone suspects him of bm'ing again in a future gm svs ladder duel.

This post was edited by JohnDoeX on Sep 6 2010 08:26pm

only reason he would need to record is to prove not bm i think who ever he is dueling sohuld ahve to have it to cuz it does slow computers down so if u think he's bming ui both record if dont think hes bming then no need to record but if u do both must post vedio of duel to prove both took

This post was edited by Noeymc on Sep 6 2010 08:28pm

he was BMing a svs/gm

i personally think thats just as bad as bming in a ladder match. why bm a completly gm game vs completly gm people?
no im not saying this because i cant kill him, i can kill him, and i have, when he plays legit.
either way tho, refusing to show an armor upon request is bm to start with. The only reason why you are any good is because you have your E-friends importing your shit in. W/o them you wouldnt even have a sorc to begin with imho.

it would be different it was in a random pub game like d u e l z or duels and so on but he did it in a svs/gm which ofc is GM
i have to agree with Site on this one. go legit or GTFO. right?

reported for spam. and i hardly find u tanking 30 hits vs me as "owned". ty though. and no, you started this mess and as a result i had to let the ladder know of a bm person.

if more people decide to revoke their vote (3 more people needed now) then i will surely let him on. though an overhwleming amount of people wanted him off for bm nature


he also has to explain the stash hacks or he wont be allowed on