Lmao. Just went back. Vert shoulda definitely been granted the challenge vs #1. I’d leave simply from being tired of wasting tokens with dueling a cold word all the time lmao. Spam challenge to save yourself from being challenged from someone lower on the ladder is also gay

This post was edited by tommyd323 on May 20 2018 12:59am

Yeah one of those times id argue the 24hr wait on challenging AT ALL after a loss is a valid rule. Considering if you just keep spamming challenge on two ahead of you kinda gums up the ladder.

ty babe

this is a very biased/sensitive ladder being ran by people who don't even duel



weird stuff happens when ladders are ran by people with 0 defends

If he does what I had you do 8 years ago I’ll allow him to challenge for #1 spot immediatly.

5-0 u?

Lmk

Lol not as hard as a task as that would be to complete no. Tommy can fill you in

i'll pass ty

Removed me from ladder after I beat him 5-4 for like the #3 spot. Later claims I spammed too much or something, which I probably did, I was like 13 srs. But also had several people accusing me of mods (which he initially said he removed me for) lmao



absolutely



or he could simply rejoin and climb it.

Won't with vin on the ladder, though.

You'd struggle to hold top 3 between vert, gemmd, vin (obv) and urkel
it's why u talk and don't play when anyone good is on the ladder

This post was edited by tommyd323 on May 20 2018 09:16am

al


I’d fair just fine with that style of competition. There’s really no one I ever struggled with besides Steve back in the day. But that’s all the past anyway. Struggle as in never able to beat or barely of course.
Back when I dueled there were many more better people anyway. Not just 4 as you write.

This post was edited by Garciaparra on May 20 2018 09:50am