I don’t think someone calling you out for changing rules to give yourself an edge is nonsense.



It’s always funny when someone hosts a tournament in 2019 and edits the rule sets to better suit them. How many years have the same rules worked, but now they don’t?

Holy freeze has always been gm on east, no one sure had a problem using freeze against my vc.

No “rules” have changed but you and your opponent can agree apon terms if you’d like.

Most tournaments have rules saying “no freeze” vrs character without tele but this has never been mentioned on a vc.

There has never been a rule stating you must agree on terms or you have to not use freeze vrs a vc, they don’t exist and never have.

I think most people are referring to a gentleman’s agreement and not a in stone rule, so tabuu didn’t change anything.

I think tabuu is doing a great job trying to understand all these questions and I hope he hosts the next one aswell.

This post was edited by Shaivism on Nov 9 2019 07:52pm

Idk man kappaD has said multiple times hf is ONLY allowed if both sides agree. No one has said otherwise

Me and him used to play without freeze, I think he may be referring to that and maybe he adapted the rule into playing nice with others.

It’s probably my fault for wanting to duel people without freeze to actually learn how to play better and talking him into it and then he adapted it into his daily dueling.

But their is no rule saying this and it’s nothing but an agreement between players.

Again, another nonsense spam, and not even in the tournament hehe

The Templar won, gfg bud.

very good duels

10-8 kappa

alright what the fuck

lmao