US courts are pretty fond of circumstantial evidence. You usuallyy don't even need direct. Juries can draw inferences.

This post was edited by Holynorth on May 3 2016 04:47am

Lol D2 item that goes to the decision of a jury....

Wouldn't that be the day

How is that relevant? Theft is theft. You aren't accusing them of stealing something you own (why it wouldn't be grand larceny), since Blizzard owns the items, but instead accusing them of much more general civil offenses. There's going to be massive fact questions as to whether the theft actually happened, and that's going to lead to a jury.

This post was edited by Holynorth on May 3 2016 04:53am

Look it up stupid.

I can't believe there are this many clueless people on diablo in 2016

This post was edited by TriWinning on May 3 2016 04:55am

Look what up? Whatever you attempted to read on Wikipedia?

..... good luck suing the guy who scams you next. Lmfao

You're a fucking idiot if you think scamming some goober on D2 is going to a jury LOL. There would be absolutely zero evidence to show that the item was never given to the person after they paid. it would never even make it to court. Any lawyer or judge would laugh in your face trying to sue someone with D2 screenshots as "evidence"

This post was edited by Boilermakers on May 3 2016 05:54am

One of the screenshots I had as evidence was a phone/facebook conversation which included him admitting to have scammed me.

Another is the western union charge back with confirmation from a western union representative.

In the end, all I know is that I got the item back and was able to sell it for fg.

This post was edited by Azn Masta on May 3 2016 07:18am

wtf this thread full of kids who read my book "understanding the law for dummies"

better hit facebook, get a gym, and delete your lawyer.

barb >