Kinda of a stale mate for others though in way.. say u got 2barbs same person up top then another 2 same person up top, would be ez to just to challenge up after a loss lol... then u got homies waiting for that day to come to challenge, this could very easily happen, maybe it shoulda been thought about more, but then again ur rite its slow season maybe lels... gl men

I always think about others I guess what I'm trying to get at, not everyone can afford to barbs

This post was edited by VIK1NG on Jan 19 2017 01:46pm

hmmmm lets step back homie, look at the logic


#1 Jatt
#2 Jatt
#3 - somebody
#4 - somebody



in no scenario can #4 challengge #1.. so the goal is only to get to #3 or #2 to be able to challenge #1.



makes perfect sense.



I think whats throwing you off is you think Jatt @ #2 spot can't challenge himself for #1 spot. it's obvious he can't do that but understand it's also obvious he doesn't want to do that, he just protecting the crown from a #2 challenge


interesting safegaurd but it doesn't change the way it works.

in no scenario can #4 challengge #1.. so the goal is only to get to #3 or #2 to be able to challenge #1.

I know that silly lol.. its a cat and mouse game, slows shit down, but its all good u guys know what ur doing

the way I look at it, I wouldn't consider

1) Jatt
2) Jatt

its really

1) Taumax
2) Jata

they are completely different built, so you really not dueling the same barb twice.

its really not rocket science. We have rules in place for this reason.

I don't see any cluster bleep or congestion due to this method.


and Reg already knows congestion is due to lack of activity

would like an extension on this match, will get it done over the weekend.

would anyone like to bvb? hit me up via pm

7-5 Candy

gds